Abstract:In the contemporary information ecosystem, misinformation and disinformation pose significant challenges to public understanding and the integrity of democratic processes.Addressing these challenges requires both comprehending the nature of false information as well as the psychological underpinnings that make individuals susceptible to it. The articles included in this Research Topic collectively explore motivation-based strategies as a means of counteracting the dissemination and spread of misinformation and disinformation, emphasizing the psychological mechanisms that drive belief in false information and how they can be leveraged to enhance resilience against such threats. Each article addresses different facets of motivation and its impact on misinformation processing, yet they converge on the central theme that motivation is a powerful force in shaping individuals' receptivity to information and their ability to discern truths from falsehoods. The studies delve into ideological, cultural, emotional, and cognitive motivations, demonstrating how these can either facilitate or hinder the acceptance of misinformation and disinformation.In Ideological Predictors of Anti-Science Attitudes: Exploring the Impact of Group Based Dominance and Populism in North America and Western Europe, Remsö and Renström highlight how ideological motivations, such as group-based dominance, populism, symbolic ideology, and scientific literacy can foster skepticism towards science. Although the effect of populism tends to vary, their study finds group-based dominance to be a strong predictor of antiscience attitudes. Remsö and Renström's work underlines how deeply ingrained beliefs can lead to the rejection of scientific facts and stresses how addressing these ideological roots is crucial in efforts to counter the formation and spread of misinformation.to Conspiracy Beliefs, hypothesize that, rather than entertainment value, the perception of evil intentions by conspirators mediates beliefs in conspiracy theories and find that such perceptions play a key role in supporting implausible beliefs in the absence of credible evidence. The researchers note how emotional motivations, particularly those rooted in moral judgments, appear to be significant predictors of misinformation acceptance and stress how addressing the influence the accuracy of misinformation detection, they find that a state of metacognitive ease enhances individuals' confidence and accuracy in detecting misinformation, highlighting the role of internal efficacy as a motivational factor in promoting critical evaluation of information. By emphasizing the roles of processing fluency and internal efficacy, their work opens up new avenues for developing more effective strategies for combating the spread of disinformation in our increasingly complex information landscape.

Considering information-sharing motives to reduce misinformation

Changing the incentive structure of social media platforms to halt the spread of misinformation

Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online

Exploring Lightweight Interventions at Posting Time to Reduce the Sharing of Misinformation on Social Media

Misinformation Due to Asymmetric Information Sharing

Who Shares Misinformation on Social Media? A Meta-analysis of Individual Traits Related to Misinformation Sharing

Impact of Social Reference Cues on Misinformation Sharing on Social Media: Series of Experimental Studies

Thinking more or thinking differently? Using drift-diffusion modeling to illuminate why accuracy prompts decrease misinformation sharing

Attention and misinformation sharing on social media

Editorial: Motivation-based approaches to countering mass-mediated misinformation

Nudging Social Media toward Accuracy

How Media Competition Fuels the Spread of Misinformation

Individual differences in sharing false political information on social media: Deliberate and accidental sharing, motivations and positive schizotypy

Mitigating the influence of message features on health misinformation sharing intention in social media: Experimental evidence for accuracy-nudge intervention

Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention

A Persuasive Approach to Combating Misinformation

Why do People Share Misinformation during the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Users' unverified information-sharing behavior on social media: The role of reasoned and social reactive pathways

Intervention strategies for misinformation sharing on social media: A bibliometric analysis

Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: An affordance and cognitive load perspective

Tokenization of social media engagements increases the sharing of false (and other) news but penalization moderates it