Abstract:Background: The proliferation of misinformation on social media is a significant concern due to its frequent occurrence and subsequent adverse social consequences. Effective interventions for and corrections of misinformation have become a focal point of scholarly inquiry. However, exploration of the underlying causes that affect the public acceptance of misinformation correction is still important and not yet sufficient. Objective: This study aims to identify the critical attributions that influence public acceptance of misinformation correction by using attribution analysis of aspects of public sentiment, as well as investigate the differences and similarities in public sentiment attributions in different types of misinformation correction. Methods: A theoretical framework was developed for analysis based on attribution theory, and public sentiment attributions were divided into 6 aspects and 11 dimensions. The correction posts for the 31 screened misinformation events comprised 33,422 Weibo posts, and the corresponding Weibo comments amounted to 370,218. A pretraining model was used to assess public acceptance of misinformation correction from these comments, and the aspect-based sentiment analysis method was used to identify the attributions of public sentiment response. Ultimately, this study revealed the causality between public sentiment attributions and public acceptance of misinformation correction through logistic regression analysis. Results: The findings were as follows: First, public sentiments attributed to external attribution had a greater impact on public acceptance than those attributed to internal attribution. The public associated different aspects with correction depending on the type of misinformation. The accuracy of the correction and the entity responsible for carrying it out had a significant impact on public acceptance of misinformation correction. Second, negative sentiments toward the media significantly increased, and public trust in the media significantly decreased. The collapse of media credibility had a detrimental effect on the actual effectiveness of misinformation correction. Third, there was a significant difference in public attitudes toward the official government and local governments. Public negative sentiments toward local governments were more pronounced. Conclusions: Our findings imply that public acceptance of misinformation correction requires flexible communication tailored to public sentiment attribution. The media need to rebuild their image and regain public trust. Moreover, the government plays a central role in public acceptance of misinformation correction. Some local governments need to repair trust with the public. Overall, this study offered insights into practical experience and a theoretical foundation for controlling various types of misinformation based on attribution analysis of public sentiment.

What motivates people to counter misinformation on social media? Unpacking the roles of perceived consequences, third-person perception and social media use

Let's fight the infodemic: the third-person effect process of misinformation during public health emergencies

Does a perceptual gap lead to actions against digital misinformation? A third-person effect study among medical students

A meta-analysis of third-person perception related to distorted information: Synthesizing the effect, antecedents, and consequences

Investigation of Public Acceptance of Misinformation Correction in Social Media Based on Sentiment Attributions: Infodemiology Study Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis

Editorial: Motivation-based approaches to countering mass-mediated misinformation

Understanding health misinformation sharing among the middle-aged or above in China: roles of social media health information seeking, misperceptions and information processing predispositions

Mitigating the influence of message features on health misinformation sharing intention in social media: Experimental evidence for accuracy-nudge intervention

Exploring the impact of automated correction of misinformation in social media

Integrating Interpersonal Communication into the Influence of Presumed Media Influence Model: Understanding Intentions to Censor and Correct COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media

Nudging Away Health Misinformation on Social Media: The Roles of Social Influences and Power Distance.

Hope over fear: The interplay between threat information and hope appeal corrections in debunking early COVID-19 misinformation

Stumble on information or misinformation? Examining the interplay of incidental news exposure, narcissism, and new media literacy in misinformation engagement

How social media users become misinformed: The roles of news-finds-me perception and misinformation exposure in COVID-19 misperception

Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation Through an Online Game Based on the Inoculation Theory: Analyzing the Mediating Effects of Perceived Threat and Persuasion Knowledge

Who Shares Misinformation on Social Media? A Meta-analysis of Individual Traits Related to Misinformation Sharing

Reasons to fight: preliminary results on motivations to combat fake news

Accountability Mobilization, Guanxi and Social Media-Induced Polarization: Understanding the Bystander's Prosocial Punishment to Misinformation Spreader

Misleading and Correcting: Characteristics of Online Misinformation and Refutations in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Motivation and personality: A comparative study of social media use and misinformation in the United States and China

Community Fact-Checks Trigger Moral Outrage in Replies to Misleading Posts on Social Media