Decisions Regarding Life or Death in Comatose Children After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest*

Maayke Hunfeld,Corinne Buysse
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/pcc.0000000000003436
2024-03-06
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Abstract:The occurrence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in children is rare, with an estimated annual incidence in the United States in 2016 of 8–38 per 100,000 child-years ( 1 ). Even so, it does have great consequence with high rate of mortality and morbidity, both short-term and long-term ( 1–4 ). For example, when a child is awake soon after return of circulation (ROC) is achieved, crude outcome is most likely favorable with a great relief for parents, siblings, and the medical team. At the other end of the spectrum, the resuscitated child may progress to death by neurologic criteria (DNC) (otherwise called brain death) ( 5 ). In those children who remain comatose (with preserved brainstem reflexes) after achieving ROC, predicting prognosis remains a challenge. In adult patients, there are international guidelines for neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest (CA) ( 6 ). However, at present, there is no such guidance for pediatric patients. Against this background, we know that in some instances life-sustaining therapies are withdrawn, and in other similar settings they are not. Together, these practices mean withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WLSTs) may create a "self-fulfilling" outcome, that is, the occurrence of death after WLST reinforces the presumed relationship between clinical neuroprognostic preconditions and the inevitable outcome of death ( 7 ). Therefore, understanding the process of neuroprognostication and WLST in children after CA across different countries is important.
pediatrics,critical care medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?