Abstract 272: Withholding/withdrawal Of Life-sustaining Therapy Decision For Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients With Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Is Commonly Influenced By Perceived Unfavorable Neurological Prognosis At Early Admission

Hiromichi NaitoMasaaki SakurayaTakashi HongoTetsuya YumotoAtsunori NakaoDEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE,OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY,Okayama,JapanDept of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine,JA HIROSHIMA GENERAL HOSPITAL,Hatsukaichi,JapanDept of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine,OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY,Okayama,Japan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.146.suppl_1.272
IF: 37.8
2022-11-01
Circulation
Abstract:Circulation, Volume 146, Issue Suppl_1, Page A272-A272, November 8, 2022. Introduction:Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in patients with refractory cardiac arrest is rapidly becoming a common strategy worldwide. Despite its benefits, ECPR is still associated with significant morbidity, including a high prevalence of brain injury/ischemia. ECPR raises a variety of ethical concerns when discontinuing treatment, however, there is little information about the withholding/withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) decision for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients after ECPR.Hypothesis:We tested whether early WLST is obtained in OHCA patients with ECPR, and examined the differences in patient characteristics between ECPR/OHCA patients with or without WLST.Methods:We conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from the SAVE-J II study (a retrospective, multicenter study of ECPR in Japan from 2013 to 2018). Inclusion criteria: Patients who underwent ECPR for OHCA with internal causes. Exclusion criteria: death in the emergency department (without admission), diagnosis of brain hemorrhage/acute aortic dissection as cause of arrest. The dates and reasons for the decisions were recorded. Further, differences between ECPR/OHCA patients with or without WLST were compared using univariable analysis.Results:We included 1651 patients in the analysis; WLST was decided in 506 (31%) of patients at a median of two days. WLST was decided within three days in 291 patients (18%). Reasons for WLST decision were perceived unfavorable neurological prognosis (285/477 [59.7%]), perceived unfavorable cardiac/pulmonary prognosis (99/477 [20.7%]), inability to maintain extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support (71/477 [14.8%]), complications (12/477 [2.5%]), and others (10/477 [2%]). Older age (WLST vs. non-WLST, median [IQR]: 63 [51-71] vs. 61 [49-68], p=0.001) and daily hemodialysis before the collapse (7.7% vs. 4.7%, p=0.015) were factors in the WLST decision. Patients with WLST had higher 1 month mortality (505/506 [99.8%] vs. 889/1145 [77.6%], p<0.001).Conclusion:About one-third of ECPR/OHCA patients had WLST decided at a median of two days, mainly for perceived unfavorable neurological prognoses reason. Decisions and neurological assessments for ECPR/OHCA patients need further analysis.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?