Left-Ventricular Unloading With Impella During Refractory Cardiac Arrest Treated With Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*

Tharusan Thevathasan,Lisa Füreder,Marie Fechtner,Sivagowry Rasalingam Mørk,Benedikt Schrage,Dirk Westermann,Louise Linde,Emilie Gregers,Jo Bønding Andreasen,Christopher Gaisendrees,Takashi Unoki,Andrea L Axtell,Koji Takeda,Alice V Vinogradsky,Pedro Gonçalves-Teixeira,Anthony Lemaire,Marta Alonso-Fernandez-Gatta,Hoong Sern Lim,Arthur Reshad Garan,Amarinder Bindra,Gary Schwartz,Ulf Landmesser,Carsten Skurk,Andrea L. Axtell,Alice V. Vinogradsky
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000006157
IF: 8.8
2024-02-22
Critical Care Medicine
Abstract:Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is the implementation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) during refractory cardiac arrest when return of spontaneous circulation is not achieved. The use of ECPR has shown conflicting results with one recent smaller, randomized controlled trial (RCT) showing a survival benefit, whereas two other RCTs did not ( 1–3 ). It has been shown in a recent systematic review and meta-analysis that ECPR was associated with improved outcomes compared with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) ( 4 ). Given its immediate provision of full circulatory support, ECPR can be considered in selected patients with regards to important considerations, such as procedural complexity and post-procedural complications according to international guidelines ( 5–7 ).
critical care medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?