Improved Survival with Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Despite Progressive Metabolic Derangement Associated with Prolonged Resuscitation

Jason A Bartos,Brian Grunau,Claire Carlson,Sue Duval,Adrian Ripeckyj,Rajat Kalra,Ganesh Raveendran,Ranjit John,Marc Conterato,Ralph J Frascone,Alexander Trembley,Tom P Aufderheide,Demetris Yannopoulos,Jason A. Bartos,Ralph J. Frascone,Tom P. Aufderheide
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042173
IF: 37.8
2020-01-05
Circulation
Abstract:Background: Likelihood of neurologically favorable survival declines with prolonged resuscitation. However, the ability of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) to modulate this decline is unknown. We aimed to examine the effects of resuscitation duration on survival and metabolic profile in patients who undergo ECPR for refractory ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (VF/VT OHCA). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated survival in 160 consecutive adults with refractory VF/VT OHCA treated with the UMN-ECPR protocol (transport with ongoing CPR to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for ECPR) compared with 654 adults who had received standard CPR in the amiodarone arm of the ALPS trial. We evaluated the metabolic changes and rate of survival in relation to duration of CPR in UMN-ECPR patients. Results: Neurologically favorable survival was significantly higher in UMN-ECPR patients vs. ALPS patients (33% vs. 23%; p = 0.01) overall. The mean duration of CPR was also significantly longer for UMN-ECPR patients vs. ALPS patients (60 vs. 35 min; p < 0.001). Analysis of the effect of CPR duration on neurologically favorable survival demonstrated significantly higher neurologically favorable survival for UMN-ECPR patients compared to ALPS patients at each CPR duration interval less than 60 minutes; however, longer CPR duration was associated with progressive decline in neurologically favorable survival in both groups. All UMN-ECPR patients with 20-29 minutes of CPR (8/8) survived with neurologically favorable status compared to 24% (24/102) for ALPS patients with the same duration of CPR. There were no neurologically favorable survivors in the ALPS cohort with CPR {greater than or equal to}40 minutes, whereas neurologically favorable survival was 25% (9/36) for UMN-ECPR patients with 50-59 minutes of CPR and 19% with {greater than or equal to}60 minutes. Relative risk of mortality or poor neurologic function was significantly reduced in UMN-ECPR patients with CPR duration {greater than or equal to} 60 minutes, Significant metabolic changes included decline in pH, increased lactic acid and paCO2, and thickened left ventricular wall with prolonged professional CPR. Conclusions: ECPR was associated with improved neurologically favorable survival at all CPR durations less than 60 minutes despite severe progressive metabolic derangement. However, CPR duration remains a critical determinate of survival.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?