Abstract:In recent years, the proliferation of misinformation on social media platforms has become a significant concern. Initially designed for sharing information and fostering social connections, platforms like Twitter (now rebranded as X) have also unfortunately become conduits for spreading misinformation. To mitigate this, these platforms have implemented various mechanisms, including the recent suggestion to use crowd-sourced non-expert fact-checkers to enhance the scalability and efficiency of content vetting. An example of this is the introduction of Community Notes on Twitter. While previous research has extensively explored various aspects of Twitter tweets, such as information diffusion, sentiment analytics and opinion summarization, there has been a limited focus on the specific feature of Twitter Community Notes, despite its potential role in crowd-sourced fact-checking. Prior research on Twitter Community Notes has involved empirical analysis of the feature's dataset and comparative studies that also include other methods like expert fact-checking. Distinguishing itself from prior works, our study covers a multi-faceted analysis of sources and audience perception within Community Notes. We find that the majority of cited sources are news outlets that are left-leaning and are of high factuality, pointing to a potential bias in the platform's community fact-checking. Left biased and low factuality sources validate tweets more, while Center sources are used more often to refute tweet content. Additionally, source factuality significantly influences public agreement and helpfulness of the notes, highlighting the effectiveness of the Community Notes Ranking algorithm. These findings showcase the impact and biases inherent in community-based fact-checking initiatives.

Assessing topic-based users credibility in twitter

Information credibility on twitter in emergency situation

Reputation‐based credibility analysis of Twitter social network users

Multilevel User Credibility Assessment in Social Networks

Information Credibility in the Social Web: Contexts, Approaches, and Open Issues

In twitter we trust(ed): How perceptions of Twitter's helpfulness influence news post credibility perceptions and news engagement

Deep learning-based credibility conversation detection approaches from social network

Evaluating credibility of social media information: current challenges, research directions and practical criteria

A Text Analysis Based Method for Obtaining Credibility Assessment of Chinese Microblog Users.

Who Checks the Checkers? Exploring Source Credibility in Twitter's Community Notes

Evaluating the effect of topic consideration in identifying communities of rating-based social networks

Account credibility inference based on news-sharing networks

Research on the Credibility of Social Media Information Based on User Perception

Determining the Veracity of Rumours on Twitter

Revealing complexities when adult readers engage in the credibility evaluation of social media posts

The Effect of Feature Selection on the Accuracy of X-Platform User Credibility Detection with Supervised Machine Learning

Exploring Factors Influencing Chinese User's Perceived Credibility of Health and Safety Information on Weibo

Investigating Differences in Crowdsourced News Credibility Assessment: Raters, Tasks, and Expert Criteria

Explainable assessment of financial experts' credibility by classifying social media forecasts and checking the predictions with actual market data

Analyzing X's Web of Influence: Dissecting News Sharing Dynamics through Credibility and Popularity with Transfer Entropy and Multiplex Network Measures