Abstract:BACKGROUND: Social media have transformed the communications landscape. People increasingly obtain news and health information online and via social media. Social media platforms also serve as novel sources of rich observational data for health research (including infodemiology, infoveillance, and digital disease detection detection). While the number of studies using social data is growing rapidly, very few of these studies transparently outline their methods for collecting, filtering, and reporting those data. Keywords and search filters applied to social data form the lens through which researchers may observe what and how people communicate about a given topic. Without a properly focused lens, research conclusions may be biased or misleading. Standards of reporting data sources and quality are needed so that data scientists and consumers of social media research can evaluate and compare methods and findings across studies.OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop and apply a framework of social media data collection and quality assessment and to propose a reporting standard, which researchers and reviewers may use to evaluate and compare the quality of social data across studies.METHODS: We propose a conceptual framework consisting of three major steps in collecting social media data: develop, apply, and validate search filters. This framework is based on two criteria: retrieval precision (how much of retrieved data is relevant) and retrieval recall (how much of the relevant data is retrieved). We then discuss two conditions that estimation of retrieval precision and recall rely on--accurate human coding and full data collection--and how to calculate these statistics in cases that deviate from the two ideal conditions. We then apply the framework on a real-world example using approximately 4 million tobacco-related tweets collected from the Twitter firehose.RESULTS: We developed and applied a search filter to retrieve e-cigarette-related tweets from the archive based on three keyword categories: devices, brands, and behavior. The search filter retrieved 82,205 e-cigarette-related tweets from the archive and was validated. Retrieval precision was calculated above 95% in all cases. Retrieval recall was 86% assuming ideal conditions (no human coding errors and full data collection), 75% when unretrieved messages could not be archived, 86% assuming no false negative errors by coders, and 93% allowing both false negative and false positive errors by human coders.CONCLUSIONS: This paper sets forth a conceptual framework for the filtering and quality evaluation of social data that addresses several common challenges and moves toward establishing a standard of reporting social data. Researchers should clearly delineate data sources, how data were accessed and collected, and the search filter building process and how retrieval precision and recall were calculated. The proposed framework can be adapted to other public social media platforms.

Evaluating credibility of social media information: current challenges, research directions and practical criteria

Research on the Credibility of Social Media Information Based on User Perception

Information Credibility in the Social Web: Contexts, Approaches, and Open Issues

95: PERSONALITY AND CREDIBILITY EVALUATION: ONLINE HEALTH INFORMATION FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF EXPERT USERS

A Multi-criteria Decision Making Approach for the Assessment of Information Credibility in Social Media

Revealing complexities when adult readers engage in the credibility evaluation of social media posts

Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators

Garbage in, Garbage Out: Data Collection, Quality Assessment and Reporting Standards for Social Media Data Use in Health Research, Infodemiology and Digital Disease Detection

Impact of information credibility on social media information adoption behavior: a systematic literature review

Social Media Information Credibility Based on User Perception and Cloud Computing System

Professional versus Social Media: News Credibility and Impact

Exploring online health information quality criteria on social media: a mixed method approach

A Multidimensional Approach for Evaluating Reality in Social Media: Mixed Methods Study

Interventions to support consumer evaluation of online health information credibility: A scoping review

Design Factors of Ethics and Responsibility in Social Media: A Systematic Review of Literature and Expert Review of Guiding Principles

Factors Influencing Online Health Information Credibility: a Meta-Analysis

Assessing topic-based users credibility in twitter

Source Credibility and the Information Quality Matter in Public Engagement on Social Networking Sites During the COVID-19 Crisis.

Exploring and evaluating success factors of social media marketing strategy: a multi-dimensional-multi-criteria framework

Investigating the Effect of Attributes on User Trust in Social Media

Which cues are credible? – The relative importance and interaction of expertise, likes, shares, pictures and involvement while assessing the credibility of politicians’ Facebook postings