In twitter we trust(ed): How perceptions of Twitter's helpfulness influence news post credibility perceptions and news engagement

Barbara Millet,Jiajing Tang,Michelle Seelig,John Petit,Ruoyu Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108185

IF: 9.9

2024-02-26

Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract:This study examines the impacts of news veracity, source credibility, collective social endorsement, and perceptions of Twitter's utility on perceived credibility of and engagement with social media news posts. We conducted a 2 (Veracity: real vs. fake) × 2 (Source Credibility: credible vs. non-credible) x 2 (Collective Social Endorsement: high vs. low) online experiment ( N = 271). In processing news posts, news veracity and source credibility influenced users' perceptions of post credibility, in that real news posts from credible sources were perceived as more credible than fake news posts from non-credible sources. Contrary to previous findings, social endorsement cues did not affect users' perceptions of post credibility or news engagement intent. More importantly, users' perceptions of Twitter's helpfulness in staying informed were associated with post credibility and intent to 'like' or share. Users with higher perceptions of Twitter's helpfulness were more likely to perceive posts as credible and more likely to engage with posts on social media. The results of this study have important implications for future research on news assessment and spread on social media.

psychology, multidisciplinary, experimental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve are: to explore how the authenticity of news, the credibility of sources, collective social recognition, and users' perception of the usefulness of Twitter affect the perception of the credibility of social media news posts and user engagement. Specifically, the research aims to answer the following questions:

1. **News Authenticity**: Are there differences in the perception of credibility between real news posts and fake news posts?
2. **Source Credibility**: Are there differences in the perception of credibility between news posts from credible sources and those from non - credible sources?
3. **Collective Social Recognition**: Will high social recognition (such as the number of likes, shares, and comments) affect users' perception of the credibility of news posts and their intention to engage?
4. **Users' Perception of the Usefulness of Twitter**: How does users' perception of the usefulness of Twitter in obtaining news and keeping information updated affect their perception of the credibility of news posts and their intention to engage?

### Research Background

With the popularization of social media platforms (such as Twitter), the spread of fake news has become a serious problem. Many users have difficulty distinguishing between true and false news and may inadvertently spread misinformation. This not only affects the public's perception of events but may also have a negative impact on society, such as misinformation in political elections or false advice in public health crises.

To meet this challenge, researchers need to have a deep understanding of which factors affect users' evaluation of the credibility of news posts and their engagement behavior. Previous research has mainly focused on isolated characteristics of news posts, such as content authenticity, source credibility, or social recognition indicators, but the results are often conflicting. Therefore, this study attempts to provide a more comprehensive understanding by comprehensively considering these factors and their interactions.

### Research Method

Researchers conducted an online experiment involving 271 participants. The experimental design was 2 (authenticity: real vs. fake) × 2 (source credibility: credible vs. non - credible) × 2 (collective social recognition: high vs. low) to explore how these variables jointly affect users' perception of credibility and their intention to engage.

### Main Findings

- **News Authenticity**: Real news posts are considered more credible than fake news posts.
- **Source Credibility**: News posts from credible sources are considered more credible than those from non - credible sources.
- **Collective Social Recognition**: Different from previous research, social recognition cues did not significantly affect users' perception of the credibility of posts or their intention to engage.
- **Users' Perception of the Usefulness of Twitter**: The higher the degree to which users think Twitter is helpful for obtaining news and keeping information updated, the more likely they are to consider posts as credible and are more inclined to like or share posts.

### Conclusion

The research results show that users' perception of the usefulness of Twitter as a news source plays an important role in shaping their evaluation of the credibility of news posts and their engagement behavior. In addition, the authenticity of news and the credibility of sources are still key factors affecting users' perception of credibility. These findings are of great significance for future research on news evaluation and dissemination on social media and are helpful for formulating strategies to reduce the spread of false information and promote a more intelligent and rational digital audience.

### Formula Representation

No specific mathematical formulas are involved in the article, but the following logical relationship can be summarized:

\[
\text{Credibility Perception} = f(\text{News Authenticity}, \text{Source Credibility}, \text{Collective Social Recognition}, \text{Perception of the Usefulness of Twitter})
\]

where \( f \) represents the functional relationship, and the specific weights and interaction effects among various variables are obtained from experimental data.