Biomechanical Analysis and Comparison Between "Zeta" Miniplate Design & Conventional Miniplate System for Fixation of Fracture Segments in Transition Zone of Parasymphysis Body Region of Mandible – An In-Vitro Study

Manish Kumar,Jitender Kumar Aurora,K.N. Dubey,Parul Tandon,Preeti Sharma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.01.008
IF: 2.018
2024-02-01
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Abstract:The parasymphysis area of the mandible is highly dynamic because it is subjected to both occlusal and muscular forces. As a result, the fractures in this transition zone have a special pattern, posing a challenge for surgeons whether to use one miniplate versus two miniplates, as per Champy's recommendations. The commonest complication resulting to treat this area is mental nerve paresthesia due to the dissection and stretching of the nerve. Hence, an in-vitro research study of a newly designed "Zeta" miniplate is performed, to evaluate the biomechanical behavior using finite element (FE) analysis and biomechanical analysis along with a comparison study with the conventional miniplate configurations. The results showed that the "Zeta" miniplate produces the lowest stresses 17.511 MPa and the least total structural deformation of 0.0011 mm after applying the maximum occlusal bite force. On application of torsional load, total structural deformation was 0.0004 mm and von Mises (VM) stress value was 0.24 MPa which was lowest when compared with the two miniplate system. Hence, the newly developed Zeta miniplate is superior in terms of stability. Another benefit of its design is that it helps in preventing mental nerve paresthesia and tooth root damage while fixing and stabilizing the bony fractured segments.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?