Abstract:Decision making in the public sector centers on delivering resources and services for the common good, emphasizing an expansive set of objectives such as equity and efficiency, beyond immediate short term returns to reflect the broader cares of society and public beneficiaries. Cost-benefit analysis is a prevailing decision-making framework in the public sector that often uses the benefit to cost ratio (BCR) to compare viable alternatives, yet no systematic framework exists for evaluating many alternatives beyond the status quo of doing nothing. We propose a new framework to maximize the BCR for public sector decisions, seeking the largest improvement per marginal deployment of capacity. Requiring a status quo representable through (constrained) decision variables, the framework is generally applicable and useful to a broad set of decision contexts that involve maximizing the BCR for marginal deployments of resources. We demonstrate the applicability of our framework on a compelling case study for the New York City runaway and homeless youth shelter system, an area of high societal need. We represent this problem as a mixed integer linear fractional program (MILFP) and employ Dinkelbach's algorithm that converts the MILFP to a series of linearized mixed-integer optimization problems, making our approach tractable for fairly large problem instances. Our optimization-based algorithmic framework yields data-informed recommendations for making New York City shelter expansion decisions to better serve runaway and homeless youth, and generalizes to reveal managerial insights for optimizing the BCR. More broadly, our algorithmic decision making framework allows for iteration and comparison across multiple potential constraints ensuring action away from the status quo, thereby empowering effective assessment of marginal deployment of additional resources.

Benefit–Cost Analysis and Distributional Weights: An Overview

An Axiomatic Framework for Cost-Benefit Analysis

Energy balancing of covariate distributions

Nonparametric Approaches to Empirical Welfare Analysis

Cost–benefit analysis and 'next best' methods to evaluate the efficiency of social policies: As in pitching horseshoes, closeness matters

Benefits beyond health in the willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year

Environmental Valuation and Benefit-Cost Analysis in U.K. Policy

Generalized Social Marginal Welfare Weights Imply Inconsistent Comparisons of Tax Policies

The Elasticity of Marginal Utility of Income for Distributional Weighting and Social Discounting: A Meta-Analysis

Socioeconomic distributional impacts of evaluating flood mitigation activities using equity-weighted benefit-cost analysis

Monetizing Animal Welfare Impacts for Benefit–Cost Analysis

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Monetary and Financial Statistics

On modeling human perceptions of allocation policies with uncertain outcomes

Combining distributive ethics and causal Inference to make trade-offs between austerity and population health

Accounting for economy-wide effects, risk aversion, and inequality aversion in the cost-benefit analyses of extreme events

Who should benefit from environmental policies? Social preferences and nonmarket values for the distribution of environmental improvements

Cost–Benefit Analysis: A Decision-Support Tool or a Venue for Contesting Ecosystem Knowledge?

On the Optimization of Benefit to Cost Ratios for Public Sector Decision Making

Welfare effect analysis of pay-as-you-go pension system: Deconstruction from the perspective of relative utility and social equality

Welfare analysis in insurance markets

Incorporating Social Welfare in Program-Evaluation and Treatment Choice