Generalized Social Marginal Welfare Weights Imply Inconsistent Comparisons of Tax Policies

Itai Sher
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.07702
2021-02-15
Theoretical Economics
Abstract:This paper concerns Saez and Stantcheva's (2016) generalized social marginal welfare weights (GSMWW), which aggregate losses and gains due to tax policies, while incorporating non-utilitarian ethical considerations. The approach evaluates local tax changes without a global social objective. I argue that local tax policy comparisons implicitly entail global comparisons. Moreover, whenever welfare weights do not have a utilitarian structure, these implied global comparisons are inconsistent. One motivation for GSMWW is that it preserves the Pareto principle. I argue that the approach's problems should spark a reconsideration of Pareto if one wants to represent broader values in formal policy analysis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?