Abstract:A critical reconsideration of the EPR (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) paper shows that the EPR argument can be developed without using the concept of `element of physical reality', thus eliminating any philosophical element in the logical chains of the paper. Deprived of its philosophical ornament, the EPR argument plainly reduces to require what quantum mechanics can not do: to assign definite values to two incompatible physical quantities. Hidden variables theories built up according to Bell - type theorems are formulated on the basis of the assumption that the locality condition implies the statistical independence between two measurements space - like separated. This assumption is valid only with the additional one that statistical dependence between two measurements requires a causal connection between them. This additional assumption rules out the possibility that statistical dependence may due to an intrinsic property of the physical system under study. Therefore, hidden variables theories are built up with a restriction which leads them to be disproved by experiment. Quantum mechanical non - locality, invoked for describing EPR - type experiments, is strictly connected to the hypothesis (NDV hypothesis) according to which the twin photons of entangled pairs do not have a definite polarization before measurements. Both hypotheses are used only for describing EPR experiments and not for making predictions. Therefore, they can be dropped without reducing the predictive power of quantum mechanics concerning entangled photons pairs. Furthermore, both hypotheses can be experimentally tested by a modification of a standard experimental apparatus designed for studying entangled photons pairs.

PBR, Nonreality and Entangled Measurement

PBR, nonreality and entangled measurement

Addendum to `On the nonreality of the PBR theorem': disproof by generic counterexample

Reply to Hofer-Szabó: The PBR Theorem hasn't been Saved

Does Bell's theorem apply if perceived pseudo-Euclidean space is emergent?

An experimental test of non-local realism

What Does '(Non)-Absoluteness of Observed Events' Mean?

On the Reality of the Quantum State Once Again: A No-Go Theorem for -Ontic Models

On some EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen) issues

The Measurement Problem Is a Feature, Not a Bug--Schematising the Observer and the Concept of an Open System on an Informational, or (Neo-)Bohrian, Approach

Everything is Entangled in Quantum Mechanics: Are the Orthodox Measures Physically Meaningful?

The role of von Neumann and Lüders postulates in the EPR-Bohm-Bell considerations: Did EPR make a mistake?

Beable-guided measurement theory

EPR Paradox and Magician's Props

Why protective measurement does not establish the reality of the quantum state

Hardy'S Paradox And Measurement-Disturbance Relations

Relational Quantum Mechanics is Still Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics

On the reality of the quantum state once again: A no-go theorem for $ψ$-ontic models

Counterfactual Reasoning, Realism and Quantum Mechanics: Much Ado About Nothing?