Abstract:Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) showed that it is possible to predict with certainty the value of a property without disturbing the object in question. In contrast, Quantum Mechanics (QM) holds that if different measurement setups cannot coexist, then predictions about those can neither. Using an EPR-inspired experiment with distantly separated measurements on pairs of entangled spinning particles, Bell proved that no local hidden variable (HV) theory can describe reality in more detail than QM. However, it is possible to conceive a viable HV theory based on the assumption that the perceived structure of spacetime is emergent from a hidden curved spacetime. According to this theory, locality can be maintained for each of the measurements while what is perceived as non-locality can be ascribed to the emergence of spacetime correlations between the instruments of the two parties. The theory predicts correlations that agree with QM, provided that the hidden spacetime has three spatial dimensions. If it had fewer than three dimensions, the CHSH inequality would not be violated and if more, Tsirelson's bound would be violated. According to this HV theory, the laboratory frame of reference is a corollary of correlations of the type that are the subject of Bell's thought experiment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Does Bell's theorem apply in the case where the assumed pseudo - Euclidean space is emergent?** Specifically, the paper explores whether Bell's theorem still holds if the perceived spatial structure emerges from a hidden curved - spacetime.
### Background and Motivation
1. **EPR Paradox and Quantum Mechanics**
- Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) proposed a thought experiment, showing that the value of a certain property can be predicted without disturbing the object.
- Quantum mechanics (QM) believes that if different measurement settings cannot co - exist, then the predictions of these properties cannot co - exist either.
2. **Bell's Theorem**
- Bell, through an EPR - inspired experiment, proved that any local hidden variable (LHV) theory cannot describe reality in more detail than quantum mechanics.
- The core of Bell's theorem is that if the measurement results are determined by local hidden variables, then the expected values of these results \( P_{\text{LHV}}(\hat{a}, \hat{b}) \) must be inconsistent with \( P_{\text{QM}}(\hat{a}, \hat{b}) \) predicted by quantum mechanics.
3. **Emergent Spacetime Hypothesis**
- The paper proposes a new hypothesis, that is, the pseudo - Euclidean space we perceive emerges from a hidden curved - spacetime.
- According to this hypothesis, the locality of each measurement can be maintained, and the perceived non - locality can be attributed to the emergence of spacetime correlations between instruments.
### Main Contributions
1. **Reformulating the LHV Theory**
- The author reformulates Bell's LHV theory by introducing three scalars \( Z_{a\lambda} \), \( Z_{b\lambda} \) and \( Z_{ab} \).
- This reformulation enables the LHV theory to reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics under the assumption that spacetime is emergent.
2. **CHSH Inequality and Tsirelson Bound**
- The author discusses the CHSH inequality and points out that the maximum value of the CHSH expression changes in different dimensions.
- In particular, in three - dimensional space, the Tsirelson bound is \( 2\sqrt{2} \), and in higher dimensions, the maximum value is close to 4.
3. **Why Bell's Theorem Does Not Apply**
- The author points out that the proof of Bell's theorem only applies to certain combinations of measurement settings.
- Under the hypothesis of emergent spacetime, these specific combinations do not violate the CHSH inequality, so Bell's theorem does not apply in this case.
### Conclusion
By assuming that spacetime is emergent, the paper proposes a new LHV theory that can reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics without violating locality. This shows that Bell's theorem does not apply to all cases, especially when considering the emergent properties of spacetime.
### Formula Summary
- **Expected Value in Bell's Theorem**
\[
P_{\text{LHV}}(\hat{a}, \hat{b}) = -\int \rho(\lambda) A(\hat{a}, \lambda) B(\hat{b}, \lambda) d\lambda
\]
- **Reformulated Expected Value**
\[
P_{\text{LHV}}(Z_{ab}) = \frac{\int_{-1}^{1} \int_{l}^{h} f_{Z_{ab}}(Z_{a\lambda}, Z_{b\lambda}) \text{sgn}(Z_{a\lambda}) \text{sgn}(Z_{b\lambda}) dZ_{b\lambda} dZ_{a\lambda}}{\int_{-1}^{1} \int_{l}^{h} f_{Z_{ab}}(Z_{a\lambda}, Z_{b\lambda}) dZ_{b\lambda} dZ_{a\lambda}}
\]
- **CHSH Inequality**