Abstract:A critical reconsideration of the EPR (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) paper shows that the EPR argument can be developed without using the concept of `element of physical reality', thus eliminating any philosophical element in the logical chains of the paper. Deprived of its philosophical ornament, the EPR argument plainly reduces to require what quantum mechanics can not do: to assign definite values to two incompatible physical quantities. Hidden variables theories built up according to Bell - type theorems are formulated on the basis of the assumption that the locality condition implies the statistical independence between two measurements space - like separated. This assumption is valid only with the additional one that statistical dependence between two measurements requires a causal connection between them. This additional assumption rules out the possibility that statistical dependence may due to an intrinsic property of the physical system under study. Therefore, hidden variables theories are built up with a restriction which leads them to be disproved by experiment. Quantum mechanical non - locality, invoked for describing EPR - type experiments, is strictly connected to the hypothesis (NDV hypothesis) according to which the twin photons of entangled pairs do not have a definite polarization before measurements. Both hypotheses are used only for describing EPR experiments and not for making predictions. Therefore, they can be dropped without reducing the predictive power of quantum mechanics concerning entangled photons pairs. Furthermore, both hypotheses can be experimentally tested by a modification of a standard experimental apparatus designed for studying entangled photons pairs.

The role of von Neumann and Lüders postulates in the EPR-Bohm-Bell considerations: Did EPR make a mistake?

On some EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen) issues

Why Bohr was wrong in his response to EPR

Whose Projection Postulate?

Counterfactual Reasoning, Realism and Quantum Mechanics: Much Ado About Nothing?

On EPR Paradox, No Entanglement Theorem for Separate Particles and Consequences

Nonlocality and Bohr's Reply to EPR

The EPR paradox, Bell's inequality, and the question of locality

Quantifying the Mesoscopic Nature of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Nonlocality.

Irreversible Diagonalization of Mechanical Quantities and the EPR Paradox

EPR Paradox and Magician's Props

Is the Devil in h?

The Last Loophole in Bell's Theorem? A prima facie problem with superdeterminism

Local causality in the works of Einstein, Bohm and Bell

An experimental test of non-local realism

Does Bell's theorem apply if perceived pseudo-Euclidean space is emergent?

From Einstein's Theorem to Bell's Theorem: A History of Quantum Nonlocality

From Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox to Quantum Nonlocality: Experimental Investigation of Quantum Correlations

Bell's Theory with no Locality assumption: putting Free Will at work

Bell's Theory with no Locality assumption