Abstract:Twenty‐five years ago, Davis Young challenged Christian scholars to collaborate to develop a viable position that took into account both the antiquity of the human race and the cardinal doctrines of humanity and sin. This BioLogos‐funded project attempts to do this. All assume the evolutionary development of humanity and attempt to show how essential Christian doctrines can respond. Section titles make this obvious: "The Image of God and Evolution," "Original Sin and Evolution" and "Evil and Evolution." The first section addresses the meaning of the image of God from various viewpoints: functional (humans have been given a task) by Harris; structural (humanity has some inherent quality) by Visala; relational (the nature of the Godhead corresponds to various human relationships) by Oord; and dynamic (the eschatological end intended for humanity) by Peters. The second section deals with original sin. Several contributors stress the distinction between the originating (or causing) sin of the first humans and originated (caused) sin of subsequent descendants. Pinsent, develops an Augustinian approach; Collins, a federal headship explanation; McCoy, an Irenaean method; Toren, a cultural spread model; and Hays, a non‐historical account. The final section turns to theodicy. One of the best essays is Rosenberg's work on how Augustine's privation model need not exclude decay prior to the fall. Lloyd discusses the role of non‐human agency, while the Irenaean approach is set out by Swinburne. In the final two articles, Southgate sets out a free‐process model, while Vitale sets out an intriguing approach he calls non‐identity theodicy. Apart from summary work by the associate editors, there is little interaction between approaches. No attempt is made to come to one conclusion. However, it does demonstrate that cardinal doctrines need not be abandoned because of evolutionary theory. The goal is well‐expressed in the subtitle of one essay: "Creating Space at the Interface of Modern Science and the Christian Tradition."

Did Christ die only for the Elect?: Limited Atonement vs. Unlimited Atonement

Atonement Problem for Contradictory Christology

Reparative Substitution and the ‘Efficacy Objection’: Toward a Modified Satisfaction Theory of Atonement

The Doctrine of the Atonement: Response to Michael Rea, Trent Dougherty, and Brandon Warmke

Voluntarism, Atonement, and Duns Scotus

The Logic of Reparative Substitution: Contemporary Restitution Models of Atonement, Divine Justice, and Somatic Death

Original Sin vs. Original Grace: The Adamic Fall and the Primordial Covenant

Toward an African Theory of the Atonement

Communal Substitutionary Atonement

Erik H. Erikson’s identity theory and the formation of early Christianity

Conceptualizing the Atonement

FINDING OURSELVES AFTER DARWIN: CONVERSATIONS ON THE IMAGE OF GOD, ORIGINAL SIN, AND THE PROBLEM OF EVIL. Edited by Stanley P.Rosenberg. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2018. Pp. vii + 384. $34.00.

Atonement

Arguing for Atonement?

Anxiety, Guilt, and Shame in the Atonement

Communal sin, atonement, and group non-agential moral responsibility

Authorial Atonement in Ian McEwan’s Atonement and Sweet Tooth

Narrative and Atonement: The Ministry of Reconciliation in the Work of James H. Cone

Penal Substitutionary Atonement and Concern for Suffering: An Empirical Study

On Bonhoeffer'S Christ-Event And Its Significance For Sino-Christian Theology