Ethical Ways Of World-Making: Re-Reading Ian Mcewan'S Atonement
Shang Biwu
2019-01-01
Abstract:As a rejoinder to Roman Ingarden's phenomenological ways of worldmaking, Nelson Goodman's constructive ways of worldmaking, Roger C. Schank and Robert P. Abelson's cognitive psychological ways of worldmaking, Birgit Neumann and Martin Zierold's media ways of worldmaking, and Ansgar Nunning and David Herman's narrative ways of world-making, this article, inspired by Nie Zhenzhao's ethical literary criticism, proposes ethical ways of worldmaking. It argues that ethics is not only a way of understanding the world but also a means of building up the world. In a storyworld created by narrative fictions, characters are endowed with certain ethical identities and ethical consciousness. To maintain the stability of the world, all characters need to abide by certain ethical orders, and placed within a particular ethical environment, characters make ethical choices proper accordingly. The paper attempts to draw on Ian McEwan's novel Atonement to illuminate this argument. In Atonement, Briony, for the sake of getting things ethically appropriate, takes her responsibility of writing, rewriting and disrupting the world, while readers recreate and delve into the world of ethical conflicts, in the process of which they come to terms with Briony both as the author of her novel Atonement and as the character in McEwan's Atonement. The work goes beyond the boundary of modernism and postmodernism by penetrating into the deep moral concerns of literature. It is at the point of ethics that both the author and readers come together in making and remaking the worlds. If we examine the ways of worldmaking of McEwan by wearing ethical lenses, we can fruitfully reveal and unpack the ethical elements of his work, and thus reap much ethical knowledge, which is perhaps one of the reasons why we shall resettle him from "Ian Macabre" to "Ethical McEwan".