The cost of direct air capture and storage can be reduced via strategic deployment but is unlikely to fall below stated cost targets

John Young,Noah McQueen,Charithea Charalambous,Spyros Foteinis,Olivia Hawrot,Manuel Ojeda,Hélène Pilorgé,John Andresen,Peter Psarras,Phil Renforth,Susana Garcia,Mijndert van der Spek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.06.004
IF: 14.944
2023-07-21
One Earth
Abstract:Direct air capture and storage (DACS) of CO2 can enable negative emissions that we critically need to meet the Paris climate targets. The feasibility of DACS depends on its economic viability and costs further along the technological learning curve, which is presently underexplored. Here, we fill the knowledge gap via a top-down and bottom-up cost evaluation approach. We find that the long-term cost can fall substantially, but stronger policy support will be required to meet optimistic targets.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?