Abstract:Food hoarding provides animals access to resources during periods of scarcity. Studies on mammalian caching indicate associations with brain size, seasonality and diet but are biased to a subset of rodents. Whether the behaviour is generalizable at other taxonomic scales and/or is influenced by other ecological factors is less understood. Population density may influence food caching due to food competition or pilferage, but this remains untested in a comparative framework. Using phylogenetic analyses, we assessed the role of morphology (body and brain size), climate, diet breadth and population density on food caching behaviour evolution at multiple taxonomic scales. We also used a long-term dataset on caching behaviour of red squirrels (Tamiasciurus fremonti) to test key factors (climate and population density) on hoarding intensity. Consistent with previous smaller scale studies, we found the mammalian ancestral state for food caching was larderhoarding, and scatterhoarding was derived. Caching strategy was strongly associated with brain size, population density and climate. Mammals with larger brains and hippocampal volumes were more likely to scatterhoard, and species living at higher population densities and in colder climates were more likely to larderhoard. Finer-scale analyses within families, sub-families and tribes indicated that the behaviour is evolutionary labile. Brain size in family Sciuridae and tribe Marmotini was larger in scatterhoarders, but not in other tribes. Scatterhoarding in tribe Marmotini was more likely in species with lower population densities while scatterhoarding in tribe Sciurini was associated with warmer climates. Red squirrel larderhoarding intensity was positively related to population density but not climate, implicating food competition or pilferage as an important mechanism mediating caching behaviour. Our results are consistent with previous smaller-scale studies on food caching and indicate the evolutionary patterns of mammalian food caching are broadly generalizable. Given the lability of caching behaviour as evidenced by the variability of our results at finer phylogenetic scales, comparative analyses must consider taxonomic scale. Applying our results to conservation could prove useful as changes in population density or climate may select for different food caching strategies and thus can inform management of threatened and endangered species and their habitats.

Smarter foragers do not forage smarter: a test of the diet hypothesis for brain expansion

Primate brain size is predicted by diet but not sociality

Both diet and sociality affect primate brain-size evolution

Bird brains fit the bill: morphological diversification and the evolution of avian brain size

Why big brains? A comparison of models for both primate and carnivore brain size evolution

Why are there so many explanations for primate brain evolution?

Linking the evolution of two prefrontal brain regions to social and foraging challenges in primates

Significance of Evolutionary Lags in the Primate Brain Size/Body Size Relationship

Death of the (traveling) salesman: primates do not show clear evidence of multi-step route planning

Comparative Genomics Provides Insights into Adaptive Evolution in Tactile-Foraging Birds

Short-term memory, attentional control and brain size in primates

Primate hippocampus size and organization are predicted by sociality but not diet

Evolutionary lability of food caching behaviour in mammals

How Smart Should a Forager Be?

Heterogeneity in the resource landscape encourages increased cognitive and perceptive capabilities in foragers

Experimental translocations to low predation lead to non-parallel increases in relative brain size

The correlated evolution of antipredator defences and brain size in mammals

Multiple within species comparisons show Tanganyikan cichlid fish have larger brains in less structurally complex habitats

Comparative support for the expensive tissue hypothesis: Big brains are correlated with smaller gut and greater parental investment in Lake Tanganyika cichlids

Ecological not social factors explain brain size in cephalopods: we need a new model for the evolution of big brains