Ecological not social factors explain brain size in cephalopods: we need a new model for the evolution of big brains
Kiran Basava,Theiss Bendixen,Alexander Leonhard,Nicole Lauren George,Zoé Vanhersecke,Joshua Omotosho,Jennifer Mather,Michael Muthukrishna
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.01.592020
2024-09-05
Abstract:Sociality has been argued to be the main selection pressure for the evolution of large brains and complex behavior on the basis of data from mammals and birds. Coleoid cephalopods have large brains, complex nervous systems and show signs of intelligent behavior comparable to that of birds, cetaceans, and primates. However, many cephalopods live largely solitary, semelparous, and short lives, leaving little to no opportunity for parental care, complex group dynamics, or social learning. A formal model is needed that takes these factors into consideration. Here we test the formal model of the “Asocial Brain Hypothesis” on cephalopod molluscs. We compiled a database of brain size, ecology, behavior, sociality, and life history from 3933 publications on the 79 species of octopus, squid, and cuttlefish for which comparable brain data is available. We analyze these data using an updated phylogeny and Bayesian multilevel models. In a set of pre- registered statistical analyses derived from the predictions of the “Asocial Brain Hypothesis” formal model, we find a large effect of habitat, suggesting ecology as a primary selection pressure on brain size in cephalopods. We also find evidence of a positive relationship between brain size and number of predator groups and no relationship between brain size and sociality. These results are inconsistent with social explanations for brain evolution but consistent with ecological explanations. They emphasize the need for new theories to explain the evolution of brains more generally, including in the cephalopods, which diverged from vertebrates over 500 million years ago.
Evolutionary Biology