Abstract:Across all birds we found significant effects of developmental mode, foraging niche, social bonding and territoriality on relative brain size. This suggests that developmental constraints, selection for complex motor skills whilst foraging, and social factors generally imposes important selection on avian brain size. However, we also found extensive heterogeneity among major avian clades in the relative importance of different variables, implying that the significance of particular ecological and social factors for driving brain size evolution is often clade‐ and context‐specific. Conflicting theories have been proposed to explain variation in relative brain size across the animal kingdom. Ecological theories argue that the cognitive demands of seasonal or unpredictable environments have selected for increases in relative brain size, whereas the 'social brain hypothesis' argues that social complexity is the primary driver of brain size evolution. Here, we use a comparative approach to test the relative importance of ecology (diet, foraging niche and migration), sociality (social bond, cooperative breeding and territoriality) and developmental mode in shaping brain size across 1886 bird species. Across all birds, we find a highly significant effect of developmental mode and foraging niche on brain size, suggesting that developmental constraints and selection for complex motor skills whilst foraging generally imposes important selection on brain size in birds. We also find effects of social bonding and territoriality on brain size, but the direction of these effects do not support the social brain hypothesis. At the same time, we find extensive heterogeneity among major avian clades in the relative importance of different variables, implying that the significance of particular ecological and social factors for driving brain size evolution is often clade‐ and context‐specific. Overall, our results reveal the important and complex ways in which ecological and social selection pressures and developmental constraints shape brain size evolution across birds.

Population comparisons reveal more social interactions are correlated with larger brains in the Lake Tanganyikan cichlid Neolamprologus brevis

Multiple within species comparisons show Tanganyikan cichlid fish have larger brains in less structurally complex habitats

Comparative support for the expensive tissue hypothesis: Big brains are correlated with smaller gut and greater parental investment in Lake Tanganyika cichlids

Ecological not social factors explain brain size in cephalopods: we need a new model for the evolution of big brains

Executive functions and brain morphology of male and female dominant and subordinate cichlid fish

Studying the evolution of social behaviour in one of Darwin’s Dreamponds: a case for the Lamprologine shell-dwelling cichlids

Fish as a model in social neuroscience: conservation and diversity in the social brain network

Why big brains? A comparison of models for both primate and carnivore brain size evolution

Bird brains fit the bill: morphological diversification and the evolution of avian brain size

Cooperation and the social brain hypothesis in primate social networks

Social complexity affects cognitive abilities but not brain structure in a Poeciliid fish

Sociality, ecology and developmental constraints predict variation in brain size across birds

An Adult Brain Atlas Reveals Broad Neuroanatomical Changes in Independently Evolved Populations of Mexican Cavefish

Primate brain size is predicted by diet but not sociality

Single-nuclei transcriptomes in the hypothalamus and POA of a highly social cichlid

Both diet and sociality affect primate brain-size evolution

Brain Size Variation in Extremophile Fish: Local Adaptation Versus Phenotypic Plasticity

Discrete hierarchical organization of social group sizes

Cavefish brain atlases reveal functional and anatomical convergence across independently evolved populations

Behavioral Attributes of Social Groups Determine the Strength and Direction of Selection on Neural Investment

Microhabitat use affects brain size and structure in intertidal gobies