Abstract:The mammalian order Primates is known for widespread sexual dimorphism in size and phenotype. Here, we use a theoretical morphology framework to show that sexual dimorphism in primate crania is associated with divergent biomechanical performance traits. Our findings suggest a sex‐linked bifurcation in performance where larger male crania and faster size evolution partially compensate for low efficiency and reflect a de‐emphasis of mechanical leverage, whereas female crania maintain higher mechanical efficiency overall and evolve more rapidly in molar‐based masticatory performance. The mammalian order Primates is known for widespread sexual dimorphism in size and phenotype. Despite repeated speculation that primate sexual size dimorphism either facilitates or is in part driven by functional differences in how males and females interact with their environments, few studies have directly assessed the influence of sexual dimorphism on performance traits. Here, we use a theoretical morphology framework to show that sexual dimorphism in primate crania is associated with divergent biomechanical performance traits. The degree of dimorphism is a significant covariate in biomechanical trait divergence between sexes. Males exhibit less efficient but stiffer cranial shapes and significant evolutionary allometry in biomechanical performance, whereas females maintain performance stability across their size spectrum. Evolutionary rates are elevated for efficiency in females whereas males emphasize size‐dependent cranial stiffness. These findings support a hypothesis of sex‐linked bifurcation in masticatory system performance: larger male crania and faster size evolution partially compensate for low efficiency and reflect a de‐emphasis of mechanical leverage, whereas female crania maintain higher mechanical efficiency overall and evolve more rapidly in molar‐based masticatory performance. The evolutionary checks‐and‐balances between size dimorphism and cranial mechanical performance may be a more important driver of primate phenotypic evolution than has been hitherto appreciated.

The correlated evolution of antipredator defences and brain size in mammals

Brawn before brains in placental mammals after the end-Cretaceous extinction

Bird brains fit the bill: morphological diversification and the evolution of avian brain size

Why big brains? A comparison of models for both primate and carnivore brain size evolution

The neural basis of defensive behaviour evolution in Peromyscus mice

Significance of Evolutionary Lags in the Primate Brain Size/Body Size Relationship

Social complexity influences brain investment and neural operation costs in ants

Brains vs Brawn: Relative brain size is sexually dimorphic amongst weapon-bearing ruminants

Why are there so many explanations for primate brain evolution?

Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Brain-Mass Correlations in Eutherian Mammals

Smarter foragers do not forage smarter: a test of the diet hypothesis for brain expansion

Blocking then stinging as a case of two-step evolution of defensive cage architectures in herbivore-driven ecosystems

Comparative support for the expensive tissue hypothesis: Big brains are correlated with smaller gut and greater parental investment in Lake Tanganyika cichlids

Experimental translocations to low predation lead to non-parallel increases in relative brain size

Beyond the kill: The allometry of predation behaviours among large carnivores

Allometry of Defense: Predator Shift Alters Ontogenetic Growth Patterns in an Antipredator Trait

Ecological not social factors explain brain size in cephalopods: we need a new model for the evolution of big brains

Primate brain size is predicted by diet but not sociality

Sexual Dimorphism and Divergent Evolutionary Pathways in Primate Cranial Biomechanics: Insights From a Theoretical Morphology Framework

Defensive responses: behaviour, the brain and the body

Both diet and sociality affect primate brain-size evolution