Abstract:Drawing from both enactivist and cognitivist perspectives on mind, I propose that explaining teleological phenomena may require reappraising both "Cartesian theaters" and mental homunculi in terms of embodied self-models (ESMs), understood as body maps with agentic properties, functioning as predictive-memory systems and cybernetic controllers. Quasi-homuncular ESMs are suggested to constitute a major organizing principle for neural architectures due to their initial and ongoing significance for solutions to inference problems in cognitive (and affective) development. Embodied experiences provide foundational lessons in learning curriculums in which agents explore increasingly challenging problem spaces, so answering an unresolved question in Bayesian cognitive science: what are biologically plausible mechanisms for equipping learners with sufficiently powerful inductive biases to adequately constrain inference spaces? Drawing on models from neurophysiology, psychology, and developmental robotics, I describe how embodiment provides fundamental sources of empirical priors (as reliably learnable posterior expectations). If ESMs play this kind of foundational role in cognitive development, then bidirectional linkages will be found between all sensory modalities and frontal-parietal control hierarchies, so infusing all senses with somatic-motoric properties, thereby structuring all perception by relevant affordances, so solving frame problems for embodied agents. Drawing upon the Free Energy Principle and Active Inference framework, I describe a particular mechanism for intentional action selection via consciously imagined (and explicitly represented) goal realization, where contrasts between desired and present states influence ongoing policy selection via predictive coding mechanisms and backward-chained imaginings (as self-realizing predictions). This embodied developmental legacy suggests a mechanism by which imaginings can be intentionally shaped by (internalized) partially-expressed motor acts, so providing means of agentic control for attention, working memory, imagination, and behavior. I further describe the nature(s) of mental causation and self-control, and also provide an account of readiness potentials in Libet paradigms wherein conscious intentions shape causal streams leading to enaction. Finally, I provide neurophenomenological handlings of prototypical qualia including pleasure, pain, and desire in terms of self-annihilating free energy gradients via quasi-synesthetic interoceptive active inference. In brief, this manuscript is intended to illustrate how radically embodied minds may create foundations for intelligence (as capacity for learning and inference), consciousness (as somatically-grounded self-world modeling), and will (as deployment of predictive models for enacting valued goals).

HEGEMONY, MORALITY AND EMOTIONS: POWER IN THE NEURAL ARCHITECTURE OF THE HUMAN MIND

Agent-based Social Psychology: from Neurocognitive Processes to Social Data

Beyond the Digital Public Sphere: Towards a Political Ontology of Algorithmic Technologies

The Mind-Body Politic

Political neuroscience: Understanding how the brain makes political decisions

Emotion and Politics: Noncognitive Psychological Biases in Public Opinion

What's Wrong with Democracy? The Peculiar Power of Kratos

Moral foundations in an interacting neural networks society

What’s Wrong with Democracy? The Peculiar Power of Kratos

Computational and neurocognitive approaches to the political brain: key insights and future avenues for political neuroscience

Introduction: Mental Powers

Defining the Self in Terms of Power, Plurality and Social Embeddedness–The Model of the Agonistic Self

Behavioral symmetry with humanomics: public choice and moral community

Algorithmization of Power: Digital Metamorphoses of Political Regimes and Sovereignty

Impact of Cognitive Dissonance on Social Hysteresis: Insights fromthe Expressed and Private Opinions Model

Visceral politics: a theoretical and empirical proof of concept

The Radically Embodied Conscious Cybernetic Bayesian Brain: From Free Energy to Free Will and Back Again

Apolitical Intelligence? Auditing Delphi's responses on controversial political issues in the US

The Emotional Dog Was a Glauconian Canine: The Reception of the Social Intuitionist Model, From the Neurocentric Paradigm to the Digital Paradigm

Emotion and Sentiment Polarity in Parliamentary Debate: A Pragmatic Comparative Study

Moral and Political Foundations: From Political Psychology to Political Realism