Introduction: Mental Powers

Matteo Grasso,Anna Marmodoro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09680-3

2019-10-31

Topoi

Abstract:Causation has been at the center of philosophical and scientific debates throughout the history of Western thought. The contemporary debate features two main opposing views. On the one side there is neo-Humeanism, the viewpoint championed by David Lewis according to which objects have causal powers in virtue of the distribution in space-time of the fundamental, intrinsic and categorical physical properties, and the (contingent) laws of nature that supervene on that distribution. This view traces back to David Hume's skeptic and reductionist take on causation, and in different forms have been widely accepted for the past three centuries. On the other side there is neo-Aristotelianism, according to which objects have properties that are essentially causal (or even, objects are built out of properties that are essentially causal). Causation is the exercise of causal powers. This view traces back to Aristotle's notions of potentiality, actuality, and essence. The past two or three decades have witnessed a very much increased interest in the neo-Aristotelian view; while the metaphysics of powers has been much developed, its applications also in various domains of philosophical inquiry have been intensely explored.1 This special issue looks at how the metaphysics of powers can be fruitfully applied to several major problems in the contemporary philosophy of mind. Many questions in philosophy of mind are still open. For instance, just to name a few: what is the metaphysical relationship between consciousness and the physical? Are phenomenal properties reducible to physical properties, fundamental, or emergent? How are we to explain notions such as belief, agency, and free will? In this issue we collected a variety of answers to these and other questions, all characterized by a focus on the metaphysical notion of powers. We have organized the contributions into five groups. The first includes two articles devoted to mental powers and their relation to metaphysical emergence (Carruth and Paolini Paoletti); the second includes two articles focused more directly on the relation between powers and conscious experience (Gozzano and Yates); the third includes four articles investigating the relevance of powers in the contemporary debate on panpsychist Russellian monism (henceforth RM) (Mørch, Goff, Chan, and Klinge); the fourth includes two articles that explore in more detail the application of neo-Aristotelian hylomorphism to the philosophy of consciousness (Owen and Jaworski); and the last includes four articles devoted to exploring power-based accounts of agency, free will, belief, and affordances (Frost, van Miltenburg and Ometto, Koziolek, and Vetter).