Agent-based Social Psychology: from Neurocognitive Processes to Social Data

Nestor Caticha,Renato Vicente

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525911003190

2011-07-26

Abstract:Moral Foundation Theory states that groups of different observers may rely on partially dissimilar sets of moral foundations, thereby reaching different moral valuations. The use of functional imaging techniques has revealed a spectrum of cognitive styles with respect to the differential handling of novel or corroborating information that is correlated to political affiliation. Here we characterize the collective behavior of an agent-based model whose inter individual interactions due to information exchange in the form of opinions are in qualitative agreement with experimental neuroscience data. The main conclusion derived connects the existence of diversity in the cognitive strategies and statistics of the sets of moral foundations and suggests that this connection arises from interactions between agents. Thus a simple interacting agent model, whose interactions are in accord with empirical data on conformity and learning processes, presents statistical signatures consistent with moral judgment patterns of conservatives and liberals as obtained by survey studies of social psychology.

Physics and Society,Social and Information Networks,Neurons and Cognition

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is to explain the differences in moral judgments among different groups by establishing an agent-based model that links neurocognitive processes with social data. Specifically, the paper focuses on:

1. **Moral Foundations Theory**: Different groups of observers may rely on partially different sets of moral foundations, leading to different moral evaluations of the same event.
2. **Diversity of Cognitive Styles**: Functional imaging techniques reveal that people with different political orientations have different cognitive styles when processing new information or confirming information.
3. **Modeling Collective Behavior**: By constructing an agent-based model to simulate information exchange and opinion interaction among individuals, these interactions qualitatively align with experimental neuroscience data.

The main conclusion of the paper is that there is a link between the diversity of cognitive strategies and the statistical characteristics of moral foundation sets, which arises from interactions among individuals. Through a simple interactive agent model, where the interactions conform to the conformity and learning processes observed in empirical data, it can predict the statistical characteristics of moral judgment patterns of conservatives and liberals. These characteristics are consistent with the results of social psychology survey research.

In short, the paper attempts to establish a mathematical model that can explain the differences in moral judgments among groups with different political orientations by combining empirical evidence from neuroscience and social psychology.