Abstract:The World Health Organisation (WHO) has recently revised how adverse events after immunization (AEFI) are classified. Only reactions that have previously been acknowledged in epidemiological studies to be caused by the vaccine are classified as a vaccine-product–related-reaction. Deaths observed during post-marketing surveillance are not considered as ‘consistent with causal association with vaccine’, if there was no statistically significant increase in deaths recorded during the small Phase 3 trials that preceded it. Of course, vaccines noted to have caused a significant increase in deaths in the control-trials stage would probably not be licensed. After licensure, deaths and all new serious adverse reactions are labelled as ‘coincidental deaths/events’ or ‘unclassifiable’, and the association with vaccine is not acknowledged. The resulting paradox is evident. The definition of causal association has also been changed. It is now used only if there is ‘no other factor intervening in the processes’. Therefore, if a child with an underlying congenital heart disease (other factor), develops fever and cardiac decompensation after vaccination, the cardiac failure would not be considered causally related to the vaccine. The Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety has documented many deaths in children with pre-existing heart disease after they were administered the pentavalent vaccine. The WHO now advises precautions when vaccinating such children. This has reduced the risk of death. Using the new definition of causal association, this relationship would not be acknowledged and lives would be put at risk. In view of the above, it is necessary that the AEFI manual be revaluated and revised urgently. AEFI reporting is said to be for vaccine safety. Child safety (safety of children) rather than vaccine safety (safety for vaccines) needs to be the emphasis.

GMC admits error in decision over whether to investigate doctor's claims over covid vaccine

GMC apologises for regulatory action against doctors convicted under now repealed homophobic laws

GP wins appeal against suspension over remote treatment of patient during pandemic

GMC says sorry to LGBTQ+ doctors, but wider persecution continues in medicine

Why GMC's apology to LGBTQ+ doctors is everything and nothing

Former GP is struck off for spreading conspiracy theories about covid pandemic

WHO Refers $29m Oxford Research Project to GMC for Misconduct

Doctor is struck off for trying to sell unproven treatments to patient with advanced cancer

BMA ȷudicial review over cost of government's pension mistakes is dismissed

Two Papers in the BMJ with Statin Side Effect Errors Shouldn’t Be Retracted, Independent Panel Concludes

Italian Surgeon Should Never Have Been Hired by Karolinska, Inquiry Concludes

Physician associates: BMA backs family's legal challenge to GMC over "blurring of lines"

Transgender care: BMA adopts neutral position on Cass review after backlash from members

"Hyped" papers by disgraced Karolinska surgeon should be retracted, says ethics board.

Revised World Health Organization (WHO)’s causality assessment of adverse events following immunization—a critique

Cochrane HPV Vaccine Review: BMJ Journal Defends “inconvenient Criticisms”

Admitting when Mistakes Are Made

Physician associates: BMA launches legal action against GMC

Details of French Trial Must Be Released Urgently, Say UK Experts

Assisted dying: RCGP to consult members on shift from opposition to law change

Physician associates: Parliament was "misadvised" on RCP's support for regulation, fellows say