Abstract:nigel.hawkes1@btinternet.com Do published outcomes tell us what’s really going on inside a hospital? Nigel Hawkes reports on how standardised mortality ratios at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust came to conceal the hospital’s failings The new NHS in England aims to empower the patient and shame failing hospitals by measuring and publishing outcomes. Open data will make health providers honest and patients better able to choose between them. How simple is that? Rather too simple, to judge by evidence presented to the public inquiry into Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, which has shown that the old NHS had ingenious ways of burnishing its outcomes and concealing its failings. Even death, the most unambiguous outcome of all, lost its sting when changes in coding practice resulted in many deaths being excluded from the calculation of hospital mortality ratios. Whether this amounted to actual dishonesty may never be determined. In his final submission Tom Kark, counsel to the inquiry, suggested that it may not be necessary for Robert Francis, the inquiry’s chair, to make any finding of fact over claims that Mid-Staffs and two other West Midlands trusts engaged in a plan to lower their apparent mortality ratios by changing the way patients were coded.1 Nor did Kark reach any firm conclusion over the suggestion that West Midlands Strategic Health Authority (SHA) sought to muddy the waters by commissioning a critical report into mortality measures, published in the BMJ, from academics known to disbelieve in the method. Both these charges were made in evidence to the inquiry by Professor Brian Jarman, the father of the hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR, see box), which has been used for the past decade by the health analytics company Dr Foster to compare hospital performance. By his reckoning, West Midlands tried to undermine the mortality data …

WHO Refers $29m Oxford Research Project to GMC for Misconduct

Prominent Geneticist Loses £3.5m Grant over Charges of Bullying

GMC admits error in decision over whether to investigate doctor's claims over covid vaccine

Cochrane Centre Based in Spain Calls for Investigation into Director's Dismissal

Formula Milk: RCPCH Promises to Review Funding Arrangements with Industry

Cochrane Director's Expulsion Results in Four Board Members Resigning.

"Hyped" papers by disgraced Karolinska surgeon should be retracted, says ethics board.

How the Message from Mortality Figures Was Missed at Mid Staffs

Patients' health or company profits? The commercialisation of academic research

Nobel Official Resigns In Wake Of Storm Over Italian Surgeon

Protection of health research participants in the United States: a review of two cases

Retracted: Outcome of Gynecologic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery with a Homemade Device and Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments in a Chinese Teaching Hospital

Italian Surgeon Should Never Have Been Hired by Karolinska, Inquiry Concludes

Retracted: Psychological Nursing Effect of Patients with Gynecological Malignant Tumor

Former GP is struck off for spreading conspiracy theories about covid pandemic

Retracted: The Construction of National Image of China by English World Media in Public Health Emergencies

Conflict of Interest in Scientific Research in China: A Socio-ethical Analysis of He Jiankui’s Human Genome-editing Experiment

Concerns about data integrity across 263 papers by one author

Cochrane HPV Vaccine Review: BMJ Journal Defends “inconvenient Criticisms”

Guidelines on gender related treatment flouted standards and overlooked poor evidence, finds Cass review

Retracted: High-Throughput Screen of Natural Compounds and Biomarkers for NSCLC Treatment by Differential Expression and Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis (WGCNA)