Abstract:Many museums and other scientific institutions still possessing the bodily remains of Indigenous people no longer resist considering their repatriation to the care of descendant communities. Whereas unconditional repatriation is now the norm in Australasia, North America and southern Africa, European museums and government cultural agencies hold to the view that releasing remains to the care of Indigenous claimants should only occur when there is clear evidence that religious and cultural continuities in caring for the dead demonstrably outweigh the ongoing public benefit of retaining remains. Campaigning by Indigenous communities in metropolitan European centres since the mid-1980s has seen museum professionals and researchers with interests in Indigenous ancestral remains acknowledge that among the ethical questions raised by their continued preservation for research is whether these relics were acquired in contexts of injustice. With this in mind, this chapter draws attention to how remains acquired by European museums were obtained in contexts of physical violence, coercion, the plundering of traditional burial places or, as happened on numerous documented occasions, the dismemberment of the bodies of Indigenous victims of colonial violence. Memories of particular individuals whose remains came into scientific hands may have faded, but as this chapter highlights, the determination of Indigenous communities to reclaim their ancestors for burial arises not only from the desire to fulfil their customary obligations to the dead but also from awareness of the contribution of the scientific work that their remains enabled to the racialisation of Indigeneity within the European imagination. This chapter draws attention to how remains acquired by European museums were obtained in contexts of physical violence, coercion, the plundering of traditional burial places or, as happened on numerous documented occasions, the dismemberment of the bodies of Indigenous victims of colonial violence. The emergence and conceptual evolution within European scientific and intellectual circles of interest in the nature, origins and implications of human variation coincided with the expansion of settler colonialism from the 1830s onwards. Contextual investigation of the history of scientific collecting and analysis of Indigenous human remains from the late eighteenth century to the early years of the twentieth century shows that its connections with settler colonialism were more complex than aiming to demonstrate the natural inferiority of Indigenous peoples. A final continuity in the history of scientific collecting and uses of Indigenous bodily remains deserves attention.

Toward Repatriation of Human Remains as a Postcolonial Museum Practice

Collecting and colonial violence

Smithsonian urged to speed repatriation of human remains

Decolonizing collections: A legal perspective on the restitution of cultural artifacts

Reviewing the experience with the repatriation of sacred ceremonial objects: A comparative legal analysis of Canada and South Africa

Dealing with Collections from Colonial Contexts: Current Developments in Germany

NAGPRA and Commodification of Cultural Property: A Legal Mechanism to Prevent Its Transfer to Europe and Return to the Native Nations

Ready for Restitution? Meeting Challenges of Colonial Legacies in Africa's Collections

The renovation of paradoxes: decolonising the Africa Museum without restituting DR Congo’s cultural heritage

Archaeology, Bioethics, and Policies Regarding the Treatment of Ancient Human Remains in Venezuela

Sepulcherised Objects and Their Decolonial Futures in African Museums: The “Robert Edward Codrington Collection” at the Zimbabwe Natural History Museum

Nationalism versus Internationalism in International Law in the Field of Cultural Relics Recovery

Return and restitution of cultural property in the wake of the 1970 Convention

Why museums should repatriate fossils

Restitution of African Cultural Heritage: Revisiting Natural Law Concepts of Statehood and Property in the Context of Colonial Spoliation

Response to the 2018 Sarr-Savoy Report: Statement on Intellectual Property Rights and Open Access Relevant to the Digitization and Restitution of African Cultural Heritage and Associated Materials

Transfilial negotiations and palimpsestuous traces: queering postcolonial memory and intergenerational transmission

The Problem of International Private Law in the Pursuit of Cultural Relics Overseas

A decolonizing approach to digital 3D visualizations and 3D printed models of human skeletal remains as demonstrative evidence in court: a view from Aotearoa New Zealand

Restitution of cultural property: the rise and fall of a cosmopolitan ideal

Collecting human remains in nineteenth-century Paris: the case of the Société Anatomique de Paris and the Musée Dupuytren