Smithsonian urged to speed repatriation of human remains

Rodrigo Pérez Ortega

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp0472

IF: 56.9

2024-03-09

Science

Abstract:Task force says museum should return many of its 30,000 remains and seek descendants' consent for research

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Toward Repatriation of Human Remains as a Postcolonial Museum Practice

Simon Jean-Nabbache

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/armw.2022.100115

2022-07-01

Museum Worlds

Abstract:On 10 January 2022, the French Senate adopted a proposed law on the circulation and return of cultural objects owned by public collections (Sénat 2022). This may be considered the first step toward repatriation legislation. This law needs to be analyzed, voted on, and possibly amended by the National Assembly before it comes back to the Senate and is finally approved. Assuming the law will be finally voted in, this will be a milestone in the process of clarifying the role and the status of human remains in museums collections.
Why museums should repatriate fossils

Craig Howe,Lukas Rieppel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02027-y

IF: 64.8

2024-06-19

Nature

Abstract:The legacy of a palaeontology expedition into Native American lands 150 years ago should prompt a rethink of where and how fossil collections are curated. The legacy of a palaeontology expedition into Native American lands 150 years ago should prompt a rethink of where and how fossil collections are curated.

multidisciplinary sciences
Scientific societies have a part to play in repatriating fossils

Hermínio Ismael de Araújo-Júnior,Renato Pirani Ghilardi,Victor Rodrigues Ribeiro,Ana Maria Ribeiro,Fernando Henrique de Souza Barbosa,Francisco Ricardo Negri,Sandro Marcelo Scheffler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02296-2

IF: 19.1

2024-01-11

Nature Ecology & Evolution

Abstract:The Brazilian Society of Palaeontology (BSP) has recently taken steps to become more involved in the repatriation of fossil specimens — a central issue in the global palaeontological community, as interest in combating scientific colonialism grows — both through collaboration with researchers and other Latin American scientific associations. We discuss our experience, including the challenges we have faced and how we have overcome them, in the hope of inspiring other scientific societies to play their part.

ecology,evolutionary biology
Collecting and colonial violence

Paul Turnbull

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203730966-27

2020-03-05

Abstract:Many museums and other scientific institutions still possessing the bodily remains of Indigenous people no longer resist considering their repatriation to the care of descendant communities. Whereas unconditional repatriation is now the norm in Australasia, North America and southern Africa, European museums and government cultural agencies hold to the view that releasing remains to the care of Indigenous claimants should only occur when there is clear evidence that religious and cultural continuities in caring for the dead demonstrably outweigh the ongoing public benefit of retaining remains. Campaigning by Indigenous communities in metropolitan European centres since the mid-1980s has seen museum professionals and researchers with interests in Indigenous ancestral remains acknowledge that among the ethical questions raised by their continued preservation for research is whether these relics were acquired in contexts of injustice. With this in mind, this chapter draws attention to how remains acquired by European museums were obtained in contexts of physical violence, coercion, the plundering of traditional burial places or, as happened on numerous documented occasions, the dismemberment of the bodies of Indigenous victims of colonial violence. Memories of particular individuals whose remains came into scientific hands may have faded, but as this chapter highlights, the determination of Indigenous communities to reclaim their ancestors for burial arises not only from the desire to fulfil their customary obligations to the dead but also from awareness of the contribution of the scientific work that their remains enabled to the racialisation of Indigeneity within the European imagination. This chapter draws attention to how remains acquired by European museums were obtained in contexts of physical violence, coercion, the plundering of traditional burial places or, as happened on numerous documented occasions, the dismemberment of the bodies of Indigenous victims of colonial violence. The emergence and conceptual evolution within European scientific and intellectual circles of interest in the nature, origins and implications of human variation coincided with the expansion of settler colonialism from the 1830s onwards. Contextual investigation of the history of scientific collecting and analysis of Indigenous human remains from the late eighteenth century to the early years of the twentieth century shows that its connections with settler colonialism were more complex than aiming to demonstrate the natural inferiority of Indigenous peoples. A final continuity in the history of scientific collecting and uses of Indigenous bodily remains deserves attention.
Archaeology, Bioethics, and Policies Regarding the Treatment of Ancient Human Remains in Venezuela

Franz Scaramelli,Kay Scaramelli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06370-6_17

2014-01-01

Abstract:AbstractWhile most countries have manifested interest in establishing agreements aimed at protecting burial sites and biocultural resources, the study of ancient human remains in Venezuela continues to suffer from a lack of awareness and forethought concerning ethically relevant issues and dilemmas regarding research, custody, storage, and repatriation. Yet, as many indigenous groups and other minority sectors are negotiating territorial claims and promoting cultural revitalization, a new phase in the development of bioanthropological research is on the horizon. Encouraged by a new Constitution supporting Venezuela’s multiethnic heritage, representatives of different sectors have been participating in the drafting of national codes dealing with human rights and bioethics. In this paper, we offer an historical synthesis of research on human remains recovered in archaeological contexts in Venezuela. The cases examined are intimately connected with past and present colonialist attitudes towards human vestiges that are often incompatible with indigenous viewpoints. We scrutinize how this divergence in outlook affects institutions, policies, and practices and discuss relevant questions on protection, informed consent, and the admissibility of scientific research.
Ethics of DNA research on human remains: five globally applicable guidelines

Songül Alpaslan-Roodenberg,David Anthony,Hiba Babiker,Eszter Bánffy,Thomas Booth,Patricia Capone,Arati Deshpande-Mukherjee,Stefanie Eisenmann,Lars Fehren-Schmitz,Michael Frachetti,Ricardo Fujita,Catherine J. Frieman,Qiaomei Fu,Victoria Gibbon,Wolfgang Haak,Mateja Hajdinjak,Kerstin P. Hofmann,Brian Holguin,Takeshi Inomata,Hideaki Kanzawa-Kiriyama,William Keegan,Janet Kelso,Johannes Krause,Ganesan Kumaresan,Chapurukha Kusimba,Sibel Kusimba,Carles Lalueza-Fox,Bastien Llamas,Scott MacEachern,Swapan Mallick,Hirofumi Matsumura,Ana Y. Morales-Arce,Giedre Motuzaite Matuzeviciute,Veena Mushrif-Tripathy,Nathan Nakatsuka,Rodrigo Nores,Christine Ogola,Mercedes Okumura,Nick Patterson,Ron Pinhasi,Samayamantri P. R. Prasad,Mary E. Prendergast,Jose Luis Punzo,David Reich,Rikai Sawafuji,Elizabeth Sawchuk,Stephan Schiffels,Jakob Sedig,Svetlana Shnaider,Kendra Sirak,Pontus Skoglund,Viviane Slon,Meradeth Snow,Marie Soressi,Matthew Spriggs,Philipp W. Stockhammer,Anna Szécsényi-Nagy,Kumarasamy Thangaraj,Vera Tiesler,Ray Tobler,Chuan-Chao Wang,Christina Warinner,Surangi Yasawardene,Muhammad Zahir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04008-x

IF: 64.8

2021-10-20

Nature

Abstract:We are a group of archaeologists, anthropologists, curators and geneticists representing diverse global communities and 31 countries. All of us met in a virtual workshop dedicated to ethics in ancient DNA research held in November 2020. There was widespread agreement that globally applicable ethical guidelines are needed, but that recent recommendations grounded in discussion about research on human remains from North America are not always generalizable worldwide. Here we propose the following globally applicable guidelines, taking into consideration diverse contexts. These hold that: (1) researchers must ensure that all regulations were followed in the places where they work and from which the human remains derived; (2) researchers must prepare a detailed plan prior to beginning any study; (3) researchers must minimize damage to human remains; (4) researchers must ensure that data are made available following publication to allow critical re-examination of scientific findings; and (5) researchers must engage with other stakeholders from the beginning of a study and ensure respect and sensitivity to stakeholder perspectives. We commit to adhering to these guidelines and expect they will promote a high ethical standard in DNA research on human remains going forward.

multidisciplinary sciences
Reviewing the experience with the repatriation of sacred ceremonial objects: A comparative legal analysis of Canada and South Africa

Owosuyi,Ifeoma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739122000200

2023-01-24

Cambridge Prisms: Water

Abstract:Recent global interest in preserving cultural identity and heritage for the future of previously colonized Indigenous groups has prompted the resuscitation of local and Indigenous cultures from the brink of extinction. The pertinence of protecting and managing cultural heritage as an endowment that transcends generations of people and serves as a ligature between their past, present, and future cannot be overstated. In this respect, the repatriation or restitution of sacred ceremonial objects (SCOs) and cultural artifacts constitutes an integral aspect of reviving Indigenous people's cultural and living heritage, which has been eroded by colonialism and other forms of occupation. In Alberta, Canada, the First Nations Sacred Ceremonial Objects Repatriation Act is the foremost legislation that provides a formal mechanism for the return of SCOs to the First Nations. Thus far, it has successfully facilitated the repatriation of several hundred repatriated several SCOs. In contrast, South Africa's primary heritage legislation, the National Heritage Resources Act, lacks direction and detail on the restitution of SCOs, specifically to cultural communities. With the aid of a comparative approach, this article critically examines one successful approach to the repatriation of specific sets of heritage objects in Canada and analyzes South Africa's legal frameworks that consider SCOs as a component of its national estate within its framework for restitution and the promotion of cultural revival in cultural communities.
Ready for Restitution? Meeting Challenges of Colonial Legacies in Africa's Collections

Solomon Sebuliba,Karsten Wesche,Willi E R Xylander

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa167

IF: 10.1

2021-01-27

BioScience

Abstract:Movements have gained momentum within the restitution debate with the aim of taking cultural objects back to Africa. The discussions are vivid. For instance, the Savoy Report stated that Europe's museums keep an overwhelmingly large share of Africa's collections, leaving the countries of origin with almost nothing (Sarr and Savoy <a class="link link-ref link-reveal xref-bibr" href="">2018</a>). Indeed, most—if not all—large museums in Europe and North America bear African collections with colonial legacies. Either their specimens originated directly from former colonies or they were obtained in the context of questionable international procedures put in place at the time. As a consequence, the content, interpretation, and representation of indigenous cultural entities in museums are contentious issues of discussion (Ashley <a class="link link-ref link-reveal xref-bibr" href="">2009</a>). Undoubtedly, Africa has become a prime region for discussing colonial legacies. It is a debate about moral and power pressure (Shyllon <a class="link link-ref link-reveal xref-bibr" href="">2017</a>).

biology
Chaco Canyon Dig Unearths Ethical Concerns

Katrina G. Claw,Dorothy Lippert,Jessica Bardill,Anna Cordova,Keolu Fox,Joseph M. Yracheta,Alyssa C. Bader,Deborah A. Bolnick,Ripan S. Malhi,Kimberly TallBear,Nanibaa' A. Garrison

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13110/humanbiology.89.3.01

2017-01-01

Human Biology

Abstract:The field of paleogenomics (the study of ancient genomes) is rapidly advancing, with more robust methods of isolating ancient DNA and increasing access to next-generation DNA sequencing technology. As these studies progress, many important ethical issues have emerged that should be considered when ancient Native American remains, whom we refer to as ancestors, are used in research. We highlight a 2017 article by Kennett et al., "Archaeogenomic evidence reveals prehistoric matrilineal dynasty," that brings to light several ethical issues that should be addressed in paleogenomics research. The study helps elucidate the matrilineal relationships in ancient Chacoan society through ancient DNA analysis. However, we, as Indigenous researchers and allies, raise ethical concerns with the study's scientific conclusions that can be problematic for Native American communities: (1) the lack of tribal consultation, (2) the use of culturally insensitive descriptions, and (3) the potential impact on marginalized groups. Further, we explore the limitations of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, which addresses repatriation but not research, because clear ethical guidelines have not been established for research involving Native American ancestors, especially those deemed "culturally unaffiliated." Multiple studies of "culturally unaffiliated" remains have been initiated recently, so it is imperative that researchers consider the ethical ramifications of paleogenomics research. Past research indiscretions have created a history of mistrust and exploitation in many Native American communities. To promote ethical engagement of Native American communities in research, we therefore suggest careful attention to ethical considerations, strong tribal consultation requirements, and greater collaborations among museums, federal agencies, researchers, scientific journals, and granting agencies.

genetics & heredity,biology,anthropology
Museum ethics—more than lip service

H Holden Thorp,H. Holden Thorp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj4713

IF: 56.9

2023-07-07

Science

Abstract:In the past few years, museums around the world have started to grapple with questions about the origins and ethics of their collections. This includes the acquisition and maintenance of natural history specimens. As museums examine their missions and processes, it seemed like a good time to talk to Sean Decatur, the new president of the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) in New York City. He spoke with me (see the full conversation here) about the museum's research and how collaborations between museums and partner nations should aspire to assemble collections that responsibly disseminate information about human cultures, the natural world, and the Universe.

multidisciplinary sciences
Advancing the ethics of paleogenomics

Jessica Bardill,Alyssa C. Bader,Nanibaa' A. Garrison,Deborah A. Bolnick,Jennifer A. Raff,Alexa Walker,Ripan S. Malhi,the Summer internship for INdigenous peoples in Genomics Consortium,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq1131

IF: 56.9

2018-04-27

Science

Abstract:Ancestral remains should be regarded not as “artifacts” but as human relatives who deserve respect

multidisciplinary sciences
Sepulcherised Objects and Their Decolonial Futures in African Museums: The “Robert Edward Codrington Collection” at the Zimbabwe Natural History Museum

Jesmael Mataga,Farai Mudododzi Chabata,Charity Nyathi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15501906211073105

2022-03-01

Abstract:This essay builds on the emerging (museum) decolonizing perspectives to (i) explore the biographical details and modes of curation and classification to which “ethnographic” 1 objects collected during the colonial era have been exposed; to (ii) foreground the complexities of inherited colonial museum processes embedded in African urban contexts; and, to (iii) consider alternative modes of engagement with ethnographic objects and local Indigenous communities to challenge the embedded regimes of care and the marginalization rendered to Indigenous epistemologies. One of the biggest questions facing museums in the world today is how to deal with the hordes of objects collected from various Indigenous communities and placed in museums far away from the communities who made and used them. Using the case of an “ethnographic” collection in a former colonial museum, we call for a paradigm shift in museum practices, and challenge the present state of affairs of museum curatorship. We then briefly suggest possible ways in which such museums can confront their imperial histories and unsettle their inherited regimes of care and representation. We call for museums to enter into conversations with communities, listening to them and effecting curatorial activities that re-center local ways of knowing, while embracing the complexities associated with such engagements.
NAGPRA and Commodification of Cultural Property: A Legal Mechanism to Prevent Its Transfer to Europe and Return to the Native Nations

Zia Akhtar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2017051

2017-11-01

Global Trade and Customs Journal

Abstract:The movement for restoration of Native American cultural property began with the enactment of the American Indian Religious Freedom Act 1978 followed by the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act 1990 (NAGPRA). However, the federal legislation has been restricted because the desecrations of graves and funeral artifacts have continued to be appropriated and transferred from the reservations to their destinations in museums and auctions houses abroad. They have mostly ended up in Europe and are displayed against the will of the Native tribes from whose lands they have been moved. The domestic legal umbrella of NAGPRA does not provides protection when cultural property is resident abroad and the framework of ‘soft’ international law such as the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation Convention (UNESCO) Convention and UNIDROIT Convention are not sufficient to facilitate their repatriation. The preventative extraterritorial legal regime has not been successful in transferring cultural property and there needs to be an improved mechanism devised to apprehend and to repatriate them to the original owners. This article argues for a framework that is international and which imposes sanctions when the iconographic property that is stolen is moved and is stored or sold for monetary gain and for its return to the rightful owners.
Informed proxy consent for ancient DNA research

Victoria E Gibbon,Jessica C Thompson,Sianne Alves

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06413-0

2024-07-04

Abstract:We argue for implementation of informed proxy or relational autonomy consent in human aDNA research, where the deceased may be represented by living people the research affects. Embracing the underlying principles and process of informed proxy consent has the potential to transform research by (1) enriching outcomes by learning from and collaborating with interested and affected persons; (2) empowering people potentially impacted by research to stipulate evidence for information flow; (3) guarding researchers against actual or perceived violations by providing a common set of guidelines; and (4) highlighting the essential nature of long-term consultation and community partnerships to research outcome success.
Faces in the museum: revising the methods of facial reconstructions

Susan Hayes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2015.1054417

2015-09-15

Museum Management and Curatorship

Abstract:Museum displays of faces derived from skeletal remains – typically referred to as facial reconstructions – are extraordinarily popular, and frequently function as iconic representations of a much broader engagement with collections from a particular people, time and place. Their actual ability to meaningfully represent either an individual or a museum collection is questionable, as facial reconstructions created for display and published within academic journals show an enduring preference for applying invalidated methods. Since 2002 there has been an increase in verified skull-soft tissue relationships, and these, together with research findings from related academic fields, can be incorporated within an evidence-based estimation of facial appearance. By illustration, a face given to an individual from the Museo de la Plata collection is critically revised to show how validated relationships result in a different face, and furthermore a face that is more closely aligned to what constitutes knowledge and display within the contemporary museum.
Dos reyes neozelandeses: Notas sobre objetivación museográfica, restos humanos y formación del imperio (Brasil – mares del sur, siglo diecinueve)

Edmundo Pereira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/laq.2020.26

2020-06-01

Latin American Antiquity

Abstract:Hacia 1820, luego de una expedición dirigida por Louis Claude de Sauces de Freycinet, el dibujante del equipo científico, Jacques Arago (1790-1855), negoció un conjunto de objetos de curiosidad con el recién fundado Museo Real, en Rio de Janeiro, entonces capital del Imperio luso-brasilero. Entre los ítems negociados, se encontraban dos cabezas embalsamadas de reyes neozelandeses. Éstas, en particular, accionaron un intrincado conjunto de actores, posiciones y proyectos que ponen de manifiesto la organización sociocultural de ese período, principalmente la relación entre Ciencia, Museos e Imperio-Nación. El artículo propone una primera lectura desde las condiciones de obtención de los dos restos, enfatizando los múltiples regímenes de objetivación por los que han pasado; desde el intercambio de armas en el contexto de las guerras coloniales; su negociación como artículos de colección científica; y finalmente, los recientes debates sobre la humanización de la Antropología y la repatriación de antepasados desaparecidos.

anthropology
Way forward in the involvement of forensic anthropology in the identification of human remains

Eugénia Cunha,Zuzana Obertová

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2024.2324746

2024-04-30

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract:Forensic anthropology should not continue to be the last resource in the identification of a forensic case. The methods to be applied in a forensic case are dictated by the state of preservation of the human remains. Forensic anthropologists (and other forensic stakeholders) should be aware of a broad spectrum of methods, their scope and limitations, to be able to perform or recommend all approaches necessary for a successful identification. The value of the so-called secondary identifiers, best designated as biological identifiers, should be reconsidered. The importance of objectivity, and impartiality will be emphasized. During a death investigation, forensic anthropologists should always formulate deductions on the biological aspects of the body before acquiring antemortem information of missing persons to avoid bias in conclusions. To illustrate our arguments, a case study is presented, where expertise in forensic anthropology has been crucial for the identification of a body in advanced state of decomposition. In this case, interdisciplinary collaborative efforts and use of multiple identifiers have led to a positive identification.

medicine, legal
Dealing with Collections from Colonial Contexts: Current Developments in Germany

Robert Peters

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.024.17037

2022-12-30

Santander Art and Culture Law Review

Abstract:The debate on the return and restitution of cultural property is by no means a new one. In recent years, however, the debate – stimulated by French President Emmanuel Macron’s speech in 2017 – extended to include the question of how to deal with collections from colonial contexts. Whereas international law provides a legal framework for how to deal with war-time looting (the 1954 Hague Convention) and the present-day trafficking in cultural property (the 1970 UNESCO Convention), no such legal regime exists for cultural objects removed during colonial times. Nevertheless, as this article illustrates – with a focus on recent examples in Germany – current developments indicate a movement towards new political and ethical schemes on how to deal with collections from colonial contexts and, in a broader sense, how to come to terms with the colonial past. In Germany, this includes the return of cultural objects and human remains to Namibia as well as the transfer of ownership of all Benin Bronzes held by German institutions to Nigeria.
The bioethics of skeletal anatomy collections from India

Sabrina C. Agarwal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45738-6

IF: 16.6

2024-02-25

Nature Communications

Abstract:Millions of skeletal remains from South Asia were exported in red markets (the underground economy of human tissues/organs) to educational institutions globally for over a century. It is time to recognize the personhood of the people who were systematically made into anatomical objects and acknowledge the scientific racism in creating and continuing to use them.

multidisciplinary sciences
Decolonising the Broken Hill Skull: Cultural Loss and a Pathway to Zambian Archaeological Sovereignty

Francis B. Musonda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10437-013-9134-3

2013-06-01

African Archaeological Review

Abstract:For more than ninety years, between 1921 and 2012, our knowledge of the Broken Hill Man phase of human evolution has been provided by scholars who have been able to access the skull in England, where it was taken in 1921. This paper presents findings of the circumstances under which the skull was discovered in Northern Rhodesia and taken to England, its significance to science, and issues relating to its return to Zambia. The study grew out of the disillusionment of Zambians due to the reluctance of the Natural History Museum in London to repatriate the skull to its country of origin. The study has established that despite the existence of a legal framework in Northern Rhodesia to regulate the removal of relics from the territory, which was then under the administration of the British South Africa Company, the Rhodesia Broken Hill Mine Company donated the skull to the British Museum (Natural History) without obtaining an export permit. It is within the context of the findings and arguments advanced by the parties involved in the claim of ownership that this paper advocates for the return of the skull to Zambia.

anthropology

Smithsonian urged to speed repatriation of human remains

Toward Repatriation of Human Remains as a Postcolonial Museum Practice

Why museums should repatriate fossils

Scientific societies have a part to play in repatriating fossils

Collecting and colonial violence

Archaeology, Bioethics, and Policies Regarding the Treatment of Ancient Human Remains in Venezuela

Ethics of DNA research on human remains: five globally applicable guidelines

Reviewing the experience with the repatriation of sacred ceremonial objects: A comparative legal analysis of Canada and South Africa

Ready for Restitution? Meeting Challenges of Colonial Legacies in Africa's Collections

Chaco Canyon Dig Unearths Ethical Concerns

Museum ethics—more than lip service

Advancing the ethics of paleogenomics

Sepulcherised Objects and Their Decolonial Futures in African Museums: The “Robert Edward Codrington Collection” at the Zimbabwe Natural History Museum

NAGPRA and Commodification of Cultural Property: A Legal Mechanism to Prevent Its Transfer to Europe and Return to the Native Nations

Informed proxy consent for ancient DNA research

Faces in the museum: revising the methods of facial reconstructions

Dos reyes neozelandeses: Notas sobre objetivación museográfica, restos humanos y formación del imperio (Brasil – mares del sur, siglo diecinueve)

Way forward in the involvement of forensic anthropology in the identification of human remains

Dealing with Collections from Colonial Contexts: Current Developments in Germany

The bioethics of skeletal anatomy collections from India

Decolonising the Broken Hill Skull: Cultural Loss and a Pathway to Zambian Archaeological Sovereignty