"Recognizing ""me"", Hoping for ""we"": A Multilevel Model of Individual Recognition in Teams"
Ning Li,Xiaoming Zheng,Brad Harris,Xin Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.12298abstract
2015-01-01
Abstract:Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings includes abstracts of all papers and symposia presented at the annual conference, plus 6-page abridged versions of the “Best Papers” accepted for inclusion in the program (approximately 10%). Papers published in the Proceedings are abridged because presenting papers at their full length could preclude subsequent journal publication. Please contact the author(s) directly for the full papers. "Recognizing ""Me"", Hoping for ""We"": A Multilevel Model of Individual Recognition in Teams"Ning Li, Xiaoming Zheng, Brad Harris and Xin LiuNing LiU. of Iowa, Xiaoming ZhengTsinghua U., Brad HarrisTexas Christian U. and Xin LiuTsinghua SEMPublished Online:30 Nov 2017https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.12298abstractAboutSections ToolsDownload CitationsAdd to favoritesTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail AbstractMany organizations use social recognition programs (e.g., "employee of the month") as a way to (a) incentivize individual recipients to maintain or enhance their performance and (b) guide improvements in the recipients’ teammates by publically acknowledging appropriate and desirable work behaviors. However, research has yet to comprehensively examine the simultaneous influences of individual social recognition in teams. Consequently, there are unanswered questions regarding who (i.e., recipients and/or teammates), if anyone, benefits from social recognition initiatives in team settings. Addressing this void, we construct a multilevel framework of social recognition in teams. Specifically, we argue that social recognition influences recipients’ self-regulation processes, which then drive increases in their engagement and performance. Concurrently, we hypothesize that the positive effects of a team member’s recognition spillover to other members via social influence processes, especially in dense work networks. Findings from a field experiment of 52 manufacturing teams reveal that social recognition does not significantly enhance recipients’ engagement and performance. However, social recognition of a teammate does positively influence the other members’ individual and collective performance and, further, these effects are stronger in denser network structures. Thus, individual social recognition programs represent a productive and cost-effective mechanism for boosting team performance. FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Vol. 2015, No. 1 Permissions Metrics in the past 12 months History Published online 30 November 2017 Published in print 1 January 2015 InformationCopyright of Academy of Management Journal is the property of Academy of Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.Keywordssocial influencesocial recognitionteam