Abstract:While existing research has examined the role of social influence on various user behavior, such as product adoption, reviews and purchases, there is a lack of studies on how social influence interacts with inherent non-social cues, such as inherent attributes. In this study, we attempt to fill in this gap, using medical crowdfunding as the research context, where information asymmetry between donors and fundraisers potentially hinders donation decisions. We first evaluate how donors leverage inherent fundraising case information, such as patient age, gender and type of disease, to assess the validity of the case. Then, through a large-scale randomized field experiment, we examine the impact of social influence on users’ willingness to donate and how this impact changes, depending on the presence of non-social signals with varying signal strength. Our results show that the weaker non-social signal, patient gender, influences the likelihood to donate only for cases lacking stronger non-social signals. More specifically, when social influence is present, donors’ willingness to donate increases but the impact of the weaker non-social signal is reduced. In contrast, for cases with multiple strong non-social signals, neither social influence or patient gender changes the willingness to donate; for cases with a single strong non-social signal, social influence improves the likelihood to donate, but patient gender does not. Overall, our findings indicate that the informational value of social influence is dependent on the presence of alternative information sources, such as inherent strong or weak non-social cues. These results also provide insights on how to leverage social influence, considering the relative informational value compared with inherent non-social cues. The informational value of social influence is particularly important for cases lacking the strong non-social signals to appear in strong need of help. Our results also provide insights on improving chances of funding success for medical crowdfunding.

Peer effects in donations: Evidence from random assignment of college roommates

Effect of Perceived Economic Mobility and Income on Charitable Behavior

Avoiding Peer Information and Its Effects on Charity Crowdfunding: A Field Experiment

Avoid Peer Information: Evidence from a Field Experiment of Charity Crowdfunding

The influence of anonymous peers on prosocial behavior

Volunteering in China: How significant is the peer effect?

Altruism or Social Motives? Evidence from Online Charitable Giving in China.

Decomposing peer effects in pro-environmental behaviour: Evidence from a Chinese nationwide survey

Does Social Influence Change with Other Information Sources? A Large-Scale Randomized Experiment in Medical Crowdfunding

The peer effects of corporate poverty alleviation behavior: Empirical evidence from China

Paying It Forward: an Experimental Study on Social Connections and Indirect Reciprocity

Individual Fundraising in Online Charitable Giving

Relative income, network interactions and social stigma

Revealing the impact of individual income inequality on different types of charitable giving in China through social interactions

How Facial Expressions of Recipients Influence Online Prosocial Behaviors? - Evidence from Big Data Analysis on Tencent Gongyi Platform.

The Impact of Information Disclosure and the Incentive Mechanism on Individual Intertemporal Committed Donation:An Experiment Study

Unobserved Altruism: How Self-Signaling Motivations and Social Benefits Shape Willingness to Donate

Peer charity donation, gratitude, and self-esteem among left-behind children

Heterogeneous peer effects of college roommates on academic performance

A Double-edged Sword : Using Public Recognition to Encourage Individual Charitable Giving . – Evidence from a Field Experiment in China

Sympathy to the Seemingly Needy: A Large-Scale Field Experiment on Social Influence and Non-Social Signals in Medical Crowdfunding