What ability is measured in “infant psychophysics”?
Lance Nizami
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4970354
2016-10-01
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Abstract:The magazine American Scientist recently celebrated Davida Teller’s “forced-choice preferential looking,” a psychophysical method that yields a detection/discrimination function for human infant vision. The method was soon adopted and modified for auditory detection/discrimination. Eventually, sufficient data accumulated for a retrospective (“Human auditory development,” L. Werner et al.). In the auditory trials, an assistant holds an infant exposed to auditory stimuli, and a hidden observer records the infant’s behavior, from which an analyst constructs a psychometric function or other quantifier of detection/discrimination. But whose detection/discrimination is quantified, exactly? Consider the roles of the laboratory personnel. The analyst (a receptor) interprets the data (stimulus) supplied by the hidden observer, who is an interpreter (receptor) of the behavior (stimulus) of the infant/infant-holder duo, who constitute a probe (receptor) of the acoustical environment. Altogether, the detection/discrimination ability being inferred is that of the entire Laboratory. In particular, infants’ apparent capabilities should improve with the observer’s ability to interpret infant behavior, and/or with the observer’s expectations, both of which may increase with infant age. Substitute methods, e.g., some already-employed non-invasive physiological recordings such as electro-encephalograms, likewise represent the ability of the Laboratory to probe the environment by way of the infant.
acoustics,audiology & speech-language pathology