Abstract:Humans can respond rapidly to viewed expressions of fear, even in the absence of conscious awareness. This is demonstrated using visual masking paradigms in healthy individuals and in patients with cortical blindness due to damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) - so called affective blindsight. Humans have also been shown to implicitly process facial expressions representing important social dimensions. Two major axes, dominance and trustworthiness, are proposed to characterize the social dimensions of face evaluation. The processing of both types of implicit stimuli is believed to occur via similar subcortical pathways involving the amygdala. However, we do not know whether unconscious processing of more subtle expressions of facial traits can occur in blindsight, and if so, how. To test this, we studied 13 patients with unilateral V1 damage and visual field loss. We assessed their ability to detect and discriminate faces that had been manipulated along two orthogonal axes of trustworthiness and dominance to generate five trait levels inside the blind visual field: dominant, submissive, trustworthy, untrustworthy, and neutral. We compared neural activity and functional connectivity in patients classified as blindsight positive or negative for these stimuli. We found that dominant faces were most likely to be detected above chance, with individuals demonstrating unique interactions between performance and face trait. Only patients with blindsight (<i>n</i> = 8) showed significant preference in the superior colliculus and amygdala for face traits in the blind visual field, and a critical functional connection between the amygdala and superior colliculus in the damaged hemisphere. We also found a significant correlation between behavioral performance and fMRI activity in the amygdala and lateral geniculate nucleus across all participants. Our findings confirm that affective blindsight involving the superior colliculus and amygdala extends to the processing of socially salient but emotionally neutral facial expressions when V1 is damaged. This pathway is distinct from that which supports motion blindsight, as both types of blindsight can exist in the absence of the other with corresponding patterns of residual connectivity.

Is blindsight possible under signal detection theory? Comment on Phillips (2021).

Bias and blindsight: A reply to Michel and Lau (2021).

Blind-Sight vs. Degraded-Sight: Different Measures Tell a Different Story

Unconscious Perception of Vernier Offsets

Sensitivity to visual features in inattentional blindness

Sensory and response contributions to visual awareness in extinction

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced Blindsight of Orientation is Degraded Conscious Vision

Invisible stimuli, implicit thresholds: Why invisibility judgments cannot be interpreted in isolation

Functional blindsight and its diagnosis

Masked blindsight in normal observers: Measuring subjective and objective responses to two features of each stimulus

A Scientific Approach to Conscious Experience, Introspection, and Unconscious Processing: Vision and Blindsight

From blindsight to sight: cognitive rehabilitation of visual field defects

Phantom perception as a Bayesian Inference problem - a pilot study

No Electrophysiological Evidence for Semantic Processing During Inattentional Blindness

Relating Blindsight and AI: A Review

What cortical areas are responsible for blindsight in hemianopic patients?

Task-Irrelevant Blindsight and the Impact of Invisible Stimuli

The Superior Colliculus and Amygdala Support Evaluation of Face Trait in Blindsight

The ideal observer: The forgotten second half of signal detection theory

The forgotten history of signal detection theory.

Network Localization of Unconscious Visual Perception in Blindsight