Abstract:In the study of women in academia, the focus is often particularly on women's stark underrepresentation in the math-intensive fields of natural sciences, technology, and economics (NTE). In the non-math-intensive of fields life, social and behavioral (LSB) sciences, gender issues are seemingly less at stake because, on average, women are well-represented. However, in the current study, we demonstrate that equal gender representation in LSB disciplines does not guarantee women's equal opportunity to advance to full professorship-to the contrary. With a cross-sectional survey among N = 2,109 academics at mid-level careers (i.e., assistant and associate professors) in the Netherlands, we test the hypothesis that in LSB (more than NTE), female academics perceive to hit a "thicker" glass ceiling-that is, they see a sharper contrast between the high representation of women at the lower compared to the top levels. We test whether this predicts female academics' lower estimated chances to reach full professorship relative to men in LSB (but not NTE). We introduce a novel perceived glass ceiling index (GCI), calculated based on academics' perceptions of the share of women and men in their direct work environment minus their perceptions of gender ratio among full professors in their field. Results confirm that the perceived glass ceiling is thicker in the non-math-intensive LSB compared to math-intensive NTE fields. Furthermore, only in LSB (but not NTE), women perceived a thicker glass ceiling than men. Moreover, only among female academics, the thicker the perceived glass ceiling, the lower their estimated chances to become full professor 1 day. Combined, a moderated mediation showed that for women only, a thicker perceived glass ceiling in LSB compared to NTE disciplines predicted their lower estimated chances to advance to full professor level. No such mediation occurred for men. We conclude that women's higher numerical representation in LSB disciplines does not negate a male-dominant normative standard about academic leadership and success. Paradoxically, the perceived odds for female academics to reach the top of their field are lower in fields where they are relatively highly represented, and this may pose unique barriers to women's perceived opportunities for career success.

Perspectives from the Netherlands on women in science

Women in Translational Medicine: Tools to Break the Glass Ceiling

Gender differences in scientific careers: A large-scale bibliometric analysis

Gender differences in Dutch research funding over time: A statistical investigation of the innovation scheme 2012–2021

Empowering women in science through role models, mentors, and support groups: a personal perspective

Female scholars need to achieve more for equal public recognition

The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education

Women of the Future in the Royal Astronomical Society

Gender Issues in Computer Science: Lessons Learnt and Reflections for the Future

Unclogging the pipeline: advancement to full professor in academic STEM

Advancing Women in Chemistry: A Step Toward Gender Parity

Gender Disparities in Nobel Prize Winning Labs. A Look into Glass Ceilings, Maternal Walls and Bottlenecks

Women in Science: Surpassing Subtle and Overt Biases through Intervention Programs

Women authors in the first 50 years of DGE-contributions and research topics

A Decade of GigaScience: Women in Science: Past, Present, and Future

Gender parity in African science

Equal Representation Does Not Mean Equal Opportunity: Women Academics Perceive a Thicker Glass Ceiling in Social and Behavioral Fields Than in the Natural Sciences and Economics

Women surgeons: How can we shape the future of new leaders? A celebration of the past with a glimpse of the future

Discipline building in Germany: women and genetics at the Berlin Institute for Heredity Research

Universitaire En Economische Pieken (mountains and Valleys in University and Economics Research in the Netherlands)

The Rise of University Colleges in Europe: A New Future for Liberal Arts & Sciences in the Twenty-First Century?