Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study was to make sense of the individual perspectives of former undergraduate student mentors from science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields who took part in an after-school STEM mentoring program. The study examined the following research questions: (1) How do former undergraduate student STEM mentors interpret and give meaning to their after-school STEM mentoring experiences? (2) In what way can an after-school STEM mentoring experience lead to a deeper understanding of the long-term implications of a STEM mentorship program? Design/methodology/approach The sample comprised 21 former undergraduate STEM mentors. The study was guided by the methods of content analysis and repertory grid (RepGrid), with data collected via highly structured interviews. Eight elements were pre-selected for the RepGrid to elicit constructs from participants. These include (1) mentoring, (2) teaching, (3) research, (4) career, (5) workforce, (6) Nebraska STEM for you (NE STEM 4U), (7) networking, and (8) communication. The researcher employed content analysis for cross-case analysis and used interpretative clustering to analyze nuanced similarities and differences among participants. Personal construct theory was used to understand how former STEM mentors made sense of their experiences. Findings The results highlight the diversity of viewpoints among participants, as well as their connections to various career paths, communication strategies, and mentorship styles. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of how STEM mentorship experiences can be tailored to the experiences of mentees. The study stresses the significance of clear communication in STEM and advises professionals to avoid excessive technical jargon to convey complex ideas. Overall, the study provides valuable insights into the motivations, perspectives, and benefits of former undergraduate mentors. Ultimately, recognizing how these factors impact STEM mentoring programs is vital for the long-term success and advancement of the STEM pipeline. Research limitations/implications The study has several limitations, including the inclusion of participants lacking knowledge or experience with the eight elements used in the RepGrids. While participants had completed a bachelor's degree in a STEM field, not all had pursued advanced schooling or careers that required knowledge or implementation of research. Practical implications Findings underscore the importance of acknowledging the diverse career paths within STEM fields to understand participants' perspectives toward mentorship. Considering the incorporation of STEM mentorship within regular school hours and making it a graduation prerequisite could enhance student participation and advancement. Integrating STEM outreach programs into higher education curricula could facilitate the development of essential professional skills (e.g. critical thinking, problem-solving) among STEM undergraduate students. These implications highlight the importance of diverse mentorship styles and professional skills to foster a more inclusive STEM workforce. Originality/value The study focused on the individual perspectives of participants rather than employing a thematic analysis.

Empowering women in science through role models, mentors, and support groups: a personal perspective

Empowering disabled scientists through mentorship

Research in Inverse Problems and Training in Computational Science: A Reflection on the Importance of Community

Empowering Undergraduate Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine: Exploring Experiences, Fostering Motivation, and Advancing Gender Equity

Nevertheless, she persisted (in science research): Enhancing women students’ science research motivation and belonging through communal goals

Empowering future scientists: Mentors employ various strategies to engage students in professional science disciplinary literacy practices

Expanding the landscape of opportunity: Professional societies support early-career researchers through community programming and peer coaching.

Mentoring through teamwork: lessons learned

Promoting professional identity, motivation, and persistence: Benefits of an informal mentoring program for female undergraduate students

The red lipstick mentor

Supporting early-career women researchers: lessons from a global mentorship programme

The long-term implications of an after-school STEM mentoring program: the perspectives of former STEM undergraduate student mentors

Empowering educators: the key to achieving gender parity in STEM fields

The power of networking in science and academia

Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Mentoring as Support for African Women’s Academic Career Trajectories

Mentoring practices that predict doctoral student outcomes in a biological sciences cohort

Catch 22 — improving visibility of women in science and engineering for both recruitment and retention

A model of mentorship for students from historically underrepresented groups in STEM

The Impact of Informal Mentorship in Academic Collaborations

Visions by WIMIN: Global Mentorship to Retain Underrepresented Trainees

Empowering STEM Students: A University-wide Mentorship Program Fostering Retention and Belonging