Abstract:Abstract Scientists are increasingly charged with solving complex societal, health, and environmental problems. These systemic problems require teams of expert scientists to tackle research questions through collaboration, coordination, creation of shared terminology, and complex social and intellectual processes. Despite the essential need for such interdisciplinary interactions, little research has examined the impact of scientific team support measures like training, facilitation, team building, and expertise. The literature is clear that solving complex problems requires more than contributory expertise, expertise required to contribute to a field or discipline. It also requires interactional expertise, socialised knowledge that includes socialisation into the practices of an expert group. These forms of expertise are often tacit and therefore difficult to access, and studies about how they are intertwined are nearly non-existent. Most of the published work in this area utilises archival data analysis, not individual team behaviour and assessment. This study addresses the call of numerous studies to use mixed-methods and social network analysis to investigate scientific team formation and success. This longitudinal case-based study evaluates the following question: How are scientific productivity, advice, and mentoring networks intertwined on a successful interdisciplinary scientific team? This study used applied social network surveys, participant observation, focus groups, interviews, and historical social network data to assess this specific team and assessed processes and practices to train new scientists over a 15-year period. Four major implications arose from our analysis: (1) interactional expertise and contributory expertise are intertwined in the process of scientific discovery; (2) team size and interdisciplinary knowledge effectively and efficiently train early career scientists; (3) integration of teaching/training, research/discovery, and extension/engagement enhances outcomes; and, (4) interdisciplinary scientific progress benefits significantly when interpersonal relationships among scientists from diverse disciplines are formed. This case-based study increases understanding of the development and processes of an exemplary team and provides valuable insights about interactions that enhance scientific expertise to train interdisciplinary scientists.

The power of networking in science and academia

Unlocking the power of virtual networking for early-career researchers

Initiating scientific collaborations across career levels and disciplines – a network analysis on behavioral data

Developing a mentoring program to support the next generation of immunologists

Interpersonal relationships drive successful team science: an exemplary case-based study

The Impact of a Researcher’s Structural Position on Scientific Performance: An Empirical Analysis

Social capital as a catalyst for gender inequality: A scoping review of networking disparities in academic medicine

Research in Inverse Problems and Training in Computational Science: A Reflection on the Importance of Community

Expanding the landscape of opportunity: Professional societies support early-career researchers through community programming and peer coaching.

Empowering women in science through role models, mentors, and support groups: a personal perspective

Career Development of Early Career Researchers via Distributed Peer Mentoring Networks

Gender, networks and academic leadership: A systematic review

Building Leadership Skills in Research Groups

Whether, How, and Why Networks Influence Men’s and Women’s Career Success: Review and Research Agenda

Promoting and Supporting Innovation Through Collaborative Research

A social science: Using psychoneuroimmunology principles to promote career longevity, productivity, and meaning

Stanford Network for Advancement and Promotion: The impact of a community building-focused leadership development program on the success of underrepresented groups in academic medicine

"Post or Perish"? An Early Career Researcher's Guide to Using Social Media

Women, artificial intelligence, and key positions in collaboration networks: Towards a more equal scientific ecosystem

Academics and Social Networking Sites: Benefits, Problems and Tensions in Professional Engagement with Online Networking

Integrating Faculty Scholarly Productivity Indicators with Professional Network Development Strategies: New Inferences Generated from Mixing Methods