Combating climate-induced health threats through Co-Constitutive Risk (CCR) Messaging: A One Health communication approach
Asheley R. Landrum,Dominik A. Stecuła,Matthew Motta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012676
2024-12-04
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Abstract:Climate-facilitated spread of mosquito-borne pathogens to new environments elevates the importance of policies that limit greenhouse gas emissions as well as the development and uptake of new pharmaceutical interventions. Whereas past research attempts to bolster support for both through either climate or health risk communication, fewer attempt to combine the risks borne by climate change and infectious disease with a single messaging intervention, i.e., co-constitutive risk messaging (CCR), a strategy of an integrative approach we call One Health Communication . In a pre-registered experiment embedded in a nationally representative survey (N = 2,200), we test whether CCR messaging impacts support for pharmaceutical interventions to minimize dengue fever health risks and/or policy efforts to mitigate climate change. We find that CCR messages are generally effective at increasing support for pharmaceutical interventions aimed at ameliorating the health risks posed by dengue fever. Moreover, we find suggestive evidence that people who hold more collectivistic worldviews are especially receptive to messages that emphasize the public (vs. the personal) health risks of dengue fever. In post hoc exploratory analyses, we show that CCR messages affect public support for climate change mitigation policies among those who express doubts about human-caused climate change. We conclude by discussing the usefulness of CCR messaging and One Health Communication approaches more broadly in various strategic communication contexts and considering additional avenues for future research. Our research explores the potential of co-constitutive risk messaging (CCR), a method within our One Health Communication framework, to influence public support for both immediate actions like vaccine uptake and broader policies such as climate change mitigation. While we observed that CCR messaging can effectively enhance pro-vaccine attitudes and behaviors, especially among those with collectivist cultural views, its impact on climate policy support was more nuanced. Notably, CCR messaging appears to resonate with individuals who are skeptical about climate change, suggesting that linking climate change to specific health risks like infectious diseases may make the abstract consequences of climate change more tangible and urgent for this group. Although our findings provide mixed support for our initial hypotheses, they represent a promising first step in evaluating CCR messaging as a strategy to address complex, interlinked issues like climate change and public health. We advocate for further research to refine and expand the application of CCR messaging specifically, and One Health Communication more broadly, potentially incorporating stronger experimental treatments and exploring its effectiveness across different cultural contexts. This approach could offer a valuable tool for strategic communicators aiming to engage diverse audiences on the intertwined challenges of health and environmental risks.
tropical medicine,parasitology