When Are Loss Frames More Effective in Climate Change Communication? An Application of Fear Appeal Theory

Scott T. Armbruster,Rajesh V. Manchanda,Ngan Vo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127411
IF: 3.9
2022-06-17
Sustainability
Abstract:This study investigated how goal frames (gain, non-loss, loss) either with or without efficacy statements affect consumers' support for climate-change policy. Addressing the goal-framing literature's difficulty in establishing a guiding theory with consistent findings, we (1) propose fear appeal theory as an alternative framework to guide goal-framing research; (2) test five fear appeal variables (fear, perceived threat, hope, perceived efficacy, and message processing) as mediators of goal-framing effects on policy support; and (3) highlight four common goal-framing confounds that may partly underlie the literature's inconsistent findings. Aligning with fear appeal theory, results from a carefully controlled experiment revealed that a more threatening loss frame paired with an efficacy statement produced the strongest pro-policy attitudes and the greatest willingness-to-pay by successfully balancing fear/threat with hope/efficacy and by producing deeper message processing.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?