Framing Effects within Moral Judgments:A New Perspective
Fenghua Liang,Jinyun Duan
2018-01-01
Abstract:Framing Effects can be found in all kinds of human judgment and decision making areas,from medical choices to commercial decisions to gambling.Recent work in moral psychology suggests that moral judgments are influenced by factors most people would deem irrelevant,such as wording effect,in which hypothetical moral scenarios are presented. But studies of moral judgment influenced by framing effects are still inadequate.To narrow down the research gaps,two scenarios were used to investigate how moral judgments are affected by positive and negative frames.The main object of the study was to explore how different description of the same moral scenari-os impact individual's moral judgment,individual's evaluating of the blamable of the choice of the scenario's protagonist and the gen-der differences about the framing effects of moral judgment.The used two scenarios were classic Asian disease and factory disturbance situation.The two scenarios were selected because they were belonged to true frame which defined by Frisch.The two scenarios were presented in positive or negative frame,after each scenario there were two solutions,certainty or risky solution,for subjects to choose. Then there were four questions for participants to answer.Using factory disturbance situation as an example,the four questions were:"Which solution would you like to choose?","Which solution do you think violates moral principle more badly?","Assuming that the workers have chosen plan A,do you think their behavior should be condemned?",and"Assuming that the workers have chosen plan B, do you think their behavior should be condemned?".The former two questions were answered according to two alternatives forced choice (plan A or B),the last two questions were answered through three Likert options(1=should not,2=not sure,3=ought to).600 col-lege students were asked to decide which solution they would like to select,to judge which solution is worse from a moral point of view, and to decide which action is more blamable if the protagonist of the scenario had chosen certainty or risky solution.Results showed that when confronted with moral judgment situations,college students tend to choose certainty solution if the scenarios were presented in pos-itive frame,and tend to choose risky solution if the scenarios were presented in negative frame.When the scenarios were presented in positive frame,subjects judged the risky solution was worse than the certainty solution.Whilst when the scenarios were presented in neg-ative frame,subjects judged the certainty solution was worse than the risky solution.The judgments about the condemnable of the protag-onist who had chosen the certainty or risky solution were different from the judgments of the violation of morality of the solution.When the scenarios were presented in positive frame,if the protagonist had chosen risky solution,his or her action was more blamable than if he or she had chosen certainty solution.But when the scenarios were presented in negative frame,subjects judged protagonist's risky so-lution as blamable as certainty solution.We also found that there were gender differences about the framing effects of moral judgment, females were more risk seeking than males in negative moral frame.