Cinema’s natural aesthetics: environments and perspectives in contemporary film theoryIntroduction
Cassandra Guan,Adam O’brien
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjaa014
2020-01-01
Screen
Abstract:From early descriptions of cinema as 'living picture' to the 'crystal-images' evoked by Gilles Deleuze, the conceptualization of filmic media has left behind an impressive scaffold of organic metaphors and biological analogies. Although a mechanistic image of cinematic modernity prevailed in academia for many decades, we know now from the work of scholars such as Hannah Landecker, Antonio Somaini and Inga Pollmann that early and classical film theory were steeped in, and frequently interacted with, scientific and cultural discourses of life, natural environments, biological formation, and evolution.<a class="link link-ref link-reveal xref-fn js-xref-fn" href=""><sup>1</sup></a> In recent years, new critical approaches informed by philosophical vitalism and post-humanist materialisms have tended to dissolve the specificity of cinema, as a theoretical and historical object, within a greater ecology of animated media, while breaking down epistemological distinctions between subject and object, the vital and the technical, the human and the nonhuman, in a plasmatic sea of animacy. Opting both for more disciplinary specificity and a variety of methodological perspectives, this dossier will rearticulate moving images' involvement with nature in terms of aesthetic mediation – by which we hope to designate a historically determined range of formal structures and sensible environments, neither fixed nor arbitrary, that condition how moving-image work can be created and experienced.