Abstract:It is demonstrated that cuprous oxide (Cu2O) can be electrodeposited epitaxially onto silicon (Si) and indium phosphide (InP) (001) single‐crystalline substrates from aqueous solution. Epitaxial electrodeposition under these conditions is remarkable considering the strong driving force for the formation of amorphous native oxide layers on Si and InP substrates. To elucidate the growth mechanisms, the microstructure of the interfaces between the Cu2O layer and the two different substrates was investigated by TEM (transmission electron microscopy) in conjunction with XEDS (X‐ray energy‐dispersive spectroscopy) and EELS (electron energy‐loss spectroscopy). In both heteroepitaxial systems, the Cu2O layers have a unique but non‐trivial crystallographic orientation relationship (OR) with the substrate, which can be described as a 45° rotation around the common [001] axis representing the substrate normal. We show that this relationship minimizes the overall misfit between corresponding interatomic spacings of the two adjacent crystals. In apparent contradiction to the unique OR, TEM revealed that in both hetero‐systems the Cu2O layer is separated from the substrate by an amorphous interlayer. The thickness of the interlayer typically is a few nanometers. The presence of an amorphous interlayer contrasts with our experimental results on electrodeposited Cu2O on Au (001) single‐crystal substrates, also included in this article, where TEM shows the Cu2O epilayer in direct contact with the substrate. XEDS and EELS analysis of the chemical composition and bonding at Cu2O/Si and Cu2O/InP interfaces in the as‐grown state as well as after tempering revealed that the interlayer is mainly composed of SiO2 and InPO4, respectively. Most likely, the observed epitaxial layers on top of an amorphous interlayer evolve by nucleation of epitaxial Cu2O directly on the substrate. While simultaneous oxidation of the substrate leads to the formation of an amorphous layer, the epitaxial nuclei can laterally overgrow the oxide. Consequently, the local composition of the amorphous layer varies with the nature of the substrate.

Formation of oxide crystallites on the porous GaAs surface by electrochemical deposition

Structural and optical properties of arsenic-oxide microcrystals on GaAs substrate for photonic applications

Atomic and Electronic Structures of Oxides on III-V Semiconductors :

Epitaxil Electrodeposition Of A Crystalline Metal Oxide Onto Single-Crystalline Silicon

Epitaxial Electrodeposition of a Crystalline Metal Oxide onto Single-Crystalline Silicon

EPITAXIAL GROWTH OF CUPROUS OXIDE ELECTRODEPOSITED ONTO SEMICONDUCTOR AND METAL SUBSTRATES

Electrochemical nanostructuring of (111) oriented GaAs crystals: from porous structures to nanowires

Direct visualization and control of SrOx segregation on semiconducting Nb doped SrTiO3 (100) surface

Enhanced surface passivation of GaAs nanostructures via an optimized SiO2 sol-gel shell growth

Improvement of the oxidation interface in an AlGaAs/AlxO y waveguide structure by using a GaAs/AlAs superlattice

Formation of Thin GaAs Buffer Layers on Silicon for Light-Emitting Devices

Effects of As8 structure formation on the surface morphology and internal microstructure of GaAs thin films

Effects ofAs8structure formation on the surface morphology and internal microstructure of GaAs thin films

Sulfurized Passivation of GaAs(100) Surfaces

The Structural, Chemical and Electronic Properties of A Stable Gas/Gaas Interface

Passivation of the GaAs(100) surface with a vapor-deposited GaS film

Etching of elemental layers in oxide molecular beam epitaxy by O2-assisted formation and evaporation of their volatile suboxide: The examples of Ga and Ge

Treatment and Aging Studies of GaAs(111)B Substrates for van der Waals Chalcogenide Film Growth

A Mild Electrochemical Sulfur Passivation Method for Gaas(100) Surfaces

Untangling the role of oxide in Ga-assisted growth of GaAs nanowires on Si substrates

Structural studies of sulfur-passivated GaAs (100) surfaces with LEED and AFM