Abstract:Characterization of Extractables and Leachables (E&Ls) is an important aspect of product quality in important fields such as pharmaceuticals, medical devices and food contact materials. The main goal of an E&L study is identification and quantification of those species which may leach from packaging materials used to contain pharmaceuticals or which may leach directly out of a medical device or food contact material and thus may result in patient exposure. It is common practice to perform relative quantitation of extractables and leachables using surrogate standards due to the large diversity of species observed and the lack of available reference standards. A key problem in obtaining accurate E&L results arises due to response factor (RF) variation. Different compounds at the same concentration give different signal intensities and thus have different RF values. Two key aspects of study quality are affected by this problem. First, the evaluation of the number of compounds which are above the toxicologically relevant threshold (analytical evaluation threshold, (AET)) can be affected (RF Problem 1: AET Underreporting). Second, quantitative accuracy is affected which can reduce the reliability of the margin of safety (MOS) calculations which serves as the basis of the toxicological evaluation (RF Problem 2: Quantitative Error). RF databases have been the main solution proposed for solving these problems but do not reduce the underlying RF variation and lack the scope required to address quantitative error for compounds not contained in the database. In the absence of other solutions, large uncertainty factors (UF) have been applied in the AET calculations to account for RF Problem 1: AET Underreporting. These UF factors have been assigned values of 4 for GCMS and up to 10 for LCMS. Large uncertainty factors have a number of unintended negative consequences including the need for large amounts of sample concentration (>10X) prior to analysis resulting in potential compound loss or degradation and increased matrix effects. To overcome these problems, this publication demonstrates a multidetector approach using an HPLC system coupled with a Quadrupole Time of Flight Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometer (QTOF-LCMS), Charged Aerosol Detector (CAD) and an Ultraviolet-Visible Detector (UV) and a dual detection Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GCMS) system using a Polyarc Reactor system with Flame Ionization Detection (FID). Herein, it is demonstrated that this combination of methods (the multidetector approach) allowed detection and accurate surrogate standard quantitation of 217 unique extractables spanning a wide range of chemical properties (Mw, logP, pKa and boiling point). The combination of optimized detector selection with appropriate standard selection was verified to provide positive detection for 94% of the compounds at the AET level and a high level of quantitative accuracy (± 20% for 85% of the compounds and ±40% for 91% of the compounds) while using only a UF of 2. Unlike the RF database approach, the multidetector approach is not limited to only those compounds contained in the database but is applicable to the majority of extractables.

Uncertainty estimation strategies for quantitative non-targeted analysis

Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization

Establishing performance metrics for quantitative non-targeted analysis: a demonstration using per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances

Integrating tools for non-targeted analysis research and chemical safety evaluations at the US EPA

Quantification Approaches in Non-Target LC/ESI/HRMS Analysis: An Interlaboratory Comparison

Exploring chemical space in non-targeted analysis: a proposed ChemSpace tool

Applications of Machine Learning to In Silico Quantification of Chemicals without Analytical Standards

Guide to Semi-Quantitative Non-Targeted Screening Using LC/ESI/HRMS

Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA): a review of examining the chemical exposome

Standardizing non-targeted analysis reporting to advance exposure science and environmental epidemiology

High resolution mass spectrometry-based non-target screening can support regulatory environmental monitoring and chemicals management

Development of a robust non-targeted analysis approach for fast identification of endocrine disruptors and their metabolites in human urine for exposure assessment

Critical review on data processing algorithms in non-target screening: challenges and opportunities to improve result comparability

Identification and quantification of medical device extractables and leachables via non-target analysis (NTA); Analytical uncertainty

Reducing relative response factor variation using a multidetector approach for extractables and leachables (E&L) analysis to mitigate the need for uncertainty factors

Enhancing compound confidence in suspect and non-target screening through machine learning-based retention time prediction

Prioritization of unknown features based on predicted toxicity categories

Estimating LoD-s Based on the Ionization Efficiency Values for the Reporting and Harmonization of Amenable Chemical Space in Nontargeted Screening LC/ESI/HRMS

Mining, refining, and QSAR analysing the nanoinformatics in EPA NaKnowBase

A Rapid and Sensitive Quantitative Analysis Method for TNT Using Raman Spectroscopy