Standardizing non-targeted analysis reporting to advance exposure science and environmental epidemiology

Allison L. Phillips,Katherine T. Peter,Jon R. Sobus,Christine M. Fisher,Carlos A. Manzano,Andrew D. McEachran,Antony J. Williams,Ann M. Knolhoff,Elin M. Ulrich
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-022-00490-1
2023-02-24
Abstract:Targeted chemical analyses have long provided gold-standard monitoring data that support exposure science and environmental epidemiology studies and eventual risk-based decisions. Despite this demonstrated utility, the advent of exposomics in 2005 yielded widespread recognition that "all" exposures encapsulate vastly more than the hundreds of routinely monitored, targeted chemical analytes [1]. To address this gap, non-targeted analysis (NTA) methods that utilize high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) have emerged as the primary analytical tools for examining chemical stressors and stress response markers without a priori knowledge of sample content. These methods enable more comprehensive characterization of the exposome at both individual (e.g., analyzing a blood sample from a person) and community (e.g., tracking chemical fingerprints in wastewater) levels. As examples of successful implementation of NTA methods, recent applications have characterized the widespread presence of previously unidentified per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in New Jersey soils [2], linked air pollution exposure to unique metabolic markers and pathways underlying the pathogenesis of cardiopulmonary disease [3], and identified potentially toxic environmental contaminants in the sera of pregnant women [4] and in human breastmilk [5].
public, environmental & occupational health,toxicology,environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?