PFAS Exposure Pathways for Humans and Wildlife: A Synthesis of Current Knowledge and Key Gaps in Understanding

Amila O. De Silva,James M. Armitage,Thomas A. Bruton,Clifton Dassuncao,Wendy Heiger‐Bernays,Xindi C. Hu,Anna Kärrman,Barry Kelly,Carla Ng,Anna Robuck,Mei Sun,Thomas F. Webster,Elsie M. Sunderland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4935

2021-01-29

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract:<p>Here we synthesize current understanding of the magnitudes and methods for assessing human and wildlife exposures to poly‐ and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Most human exposure assessments have focused on two to five legacy PFAS and wildlife assessments are typically limited to targeted PFAS (up to ~30 substances). However, shifts in chemical production are occurring rapidly and targeted methods for detecting PFAS have not kept pace with these changes. Total fluorine (TF) measurements complemented by suspect screening using high resolution mass spectrometry are thus emerging as essential tools for PFAS exposure assessment. Such methods enable researchers to better understand contributions from precursor compounds that degrade into terminal perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAA). Available data suggest that diet is the major human exposure pathway for some PFAS but there is large variability across populations and PFAS compounds. Additional data on TF in exposure media and the fraction of unidentified organofluorine are needed. Drinking water has been established as the major exposure source in contaminated communities. As water supplies are remediated, and for the general population, exposures from dust, personal care products, indoor environments and other sources may be more important. A major challenge for exposure assessments is the lack of statistically representative population surveys. For wildlife, bioaccumulation processes differ substantially between PFAS and neutral lipophilic organic compounds, prompting a revaluation of traditional bioaccumulation metrics. There is evidence that both phospholipids and proteins are important for the tissue partitioning and accumulation of PFAS. New mechanistic models for PFAS bioaccumulation are being developed that will assist in wildlife risk evaluations.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>

environmental sciences,toxicology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve are to comprehensively understand and evaluate the exposure pathways of polyfluoroalkyl and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to humans and wild animals. Specifically, the article aims to:

1. **Summarize the current understanding of PFAS exposure sources**: The article synthesizes the current knowledge about PFAS sources and their transmission paths in the environment, including PFAS released into the environment during production, use, and disposal.

2. **Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of analytical methods**: The article discusses various analytical techniques used to assess PFAS exposure, including targeted analysis, suspect screening, and non - targeted analysis, as well as total fluorine (TF) measurement methods. These methods each have their own strengths and limitations and are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of PFAS exposure.

3. **Identify the importance of different exposure pathways**: The article explores the impacts of different exposure pathways such as diet, drinking water, dust, personal care products, and indoor environments on humans, and points out that in contaminated communities, drinking water is the main exposure source; while for the general population, other exposure sources such as dust and personal care products may be more important.

4. **Understand the bioaccumulation of PFAS in wild animals**: The article also discusses the bioaccumulation process of PFAS in wild animals, points out that there are significant differences in the bioaccumulation mechanisms between PFAS and neutral lipophilic organic compounds, and emphasizes the need to re - evaluate traditional bioaccumulation indicators.

5. **Determine knowledge gaps**: The article points out the key knowledge gaps in current research, such as the lack of statistically representative group survey data and the insufficient understanding of unidentified organofluorine. These problems impede the making of science - based regulatory decisions.

By solving the above problems, the article aims to provide guidance for future research and policy - making to better address the impacts of PFAS on human health and the ecological environment.

### Formula Examples

- Total Fluorine (TF) Measurement:
\[
\text{Unidentified Organofluorine}=\text{Total Organofluorine}-\sum(\text{Known PFAS})\times\frac{\text{Molar Fluorine}}{\text{Molar PFAS}}
\]
where Total Organofluorine can be determined by multiple methods, such as combustion ion chromatography (CIC).

- TOP Assay (Oxidation Precursor Determination):
\[
\text{Oxidation Precursor Concentration}=\text{Oxidation - post PFAS Concentration}-\text{Non - oxidation PFAS Concentration}
\]

These formulas are helpful for more accurately assessing PFAS exposure levels and sources.