Abstract:Algorithms have been increasingly applied in decision-making in organizations. It is of theoretical significance and managerial relevance to explore how algorithmic decision-making affects employees’ psychological states and behaviors. Integrating the literatures of algorithmic management and justice, we adopt the attribution perspective to investigate how the type of decision-maker (algorithm vs. leader) and decision favorableness interact to affect employees’ justice perception and their subsequent organizational and social deviant behaviors. We propose that decision favorableness moderates the effect of the type of decision-makers on employees’ overall justice perception and the indirect effect of the type of decision-makers on employees’ deviant behaviors. Specifically, when the decision is unfavorable for employees, employees will perceive higher levels of overall justice if the decision is made by algorithms rather than by human leaders. In contrast, when the decision is favorable, employees’ overall justice perception will not differ significantly between the algorithmic decision situation and the leader decision situation. In addition, we propose that employees’ overall justice perception is negatively related to their deviant behaviors in both organizational and social settings. Furthermore, decision favorableness moderates the indirect effects of the type of decision-makers on employees’ organizational and social deviant behaviors via their overall justice perception, such that these indirect effects are stronger when the decision is unfavorable rather than favorable for employees.We conduct a qualitative pilot study and an experimental study to test the theoretical model. The results provide substantial support for our hypotheses. This research contributes to the emerging literature on the relationship between algorithmic decision-making and employees’ justice perception by identifying the moderating role of decision favorableness. In a broader scale, it also enhances the understanding on how algorithms affect employees’ perception. Moreover, by revealing the indirect effect of the type of decision-maker on employees’ deviant behaviors via justice perception, this research extends the scope of literature on how employees respond to algorithmic management. The findings also provide practical implications for management decision-making in the algorithm era.

Algorithm Sensemaking: How Platform Workers Make Sense of Algorithmic Management

Algorithmic Management Reimagined For Workers and By Workers: Centering Worker Well-Being in Gig Work

Pacifying the algorithm – Anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy

When the Automated Fire Backfires: the Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer's Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company

Workers' Health under Algorithmic Management: Emerging Findings and Urgent Research Questions

Working with algorithmic management: Design logic, algorithmic unfitness, and labor repair behind the wall

Can Transparency Mitigate the Effects of Algorithmic Compensation in Gig Work?

How Algorithmic Management Influences Gig Workers’ Job Crafting

Fostering Humanistic Algorithmic Management: A Process of Enacting Human-Algorithm Complementarity

Algorithmic Decision-making, Employees' Justice Perception and Deviant Behaviors: the Moderating Role of Decision Favorableness

Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers

"From What I see, this makes sense": Seeing meaning in algorithmic results

"It would be pretty immoral to choose a random algorithm"

Gig to the left, algorithms to the right: A case study of the dark sides in the gig economy

The Dark Side of Algorithmic Monitoring in Gig Economy: A Perspective on Moral Disengagement

Algorithmic management on digital labour platforms: A systematic literature review

Perceived algorithmic fairness: An empirical study of transparency and anthropomorphism in algorithmic recruiting

Algorithmic management and human-centered task design: a conceptual synthesis from the perspective of action regulation and sociomaterial systems theory

Gig worker’s perceived algorithmic management, stress appraisal, and destructive deviant behavior

Algorithmic Monitoring Increases Unethical Behavior in Gig Workers: the Mediating Role of Moral Disengagement

Investigating engagement and burnout of gig-workers in the age of algorithms: an empirical study in digital labor platforms