Abstract:Purpose Digital labor platforms (DLPs) are transforming the nature of the work for an increasing number of workers, especially through extensively employing automated algorithms for performing managerial functions. In this novel working setting – characterized by algorithmic governance, and automatic matching, rewarding and punishing mechanisms – gig-workers play an essential role in providing on-demand services for final customers. Since gig-workers' continued participation is crucial for sustainable service delivery in platform contexts, this study aims to identify and examine the antecedents of their working outcomes, including burnout and engagement. Design/methodology/approach We suggested a theoretical framework, grounded in the job demands-resources heuristic model to investigate how the interplay of job demands and resources, resulting from working in DLPs, explains gig-workers' engagement and burnout. We further empirically tested the proposed model to understand how DLPs' working conditions, in particular their algorithmic management, impact gig-working outcomes. Findings Our findings indicate that job resources – algorithmic compensation, work autonomy and information sharing– have significant positive effects on gig-workers' engagement. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that job insecurity, unsupportive algorithmic interaction (UAI) and algorithmic injustice significantly contribute to gig-workers' burnout. Notably, we found that job resources substantially, but differently, moderate the relationship between job demands and gig-workers' burnout. Originality/value This study contributes a theoretically accurate and empirically grounded understanding of two clusters of conditions – job demands and resources– as a result of algorithmic management practice in DLPs. We developed nuanced insights into how such conditions are evaluated by gig-workers and shape their engagement or burnout in DLP emerging work settings. We further uncovered that in gig-working context, resources do not similarly buffer against the negative effects of job demands.

Working with algorithmic management: Design logic, algorithmic unfitness, and labor repair behind the wall

Algorithmic Management Reimagined For Workers and By Workers: Centering Worker Well-Being in Gig Work

Workers' Health under Algorithmic Management: Emerging Findings and Urgent Research Questions

Gig to the left, algorithms to the right: A case study of the dark sides in the gig economy

When the Automated Fire Backfires: the Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer's Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company

How Algorithmic Management Influences Gig Workers’ Job Crafting

Pacifying the algorithm – Anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy

Fostering Humanistic Algorithmic Management: A Process of Enacting Human-Algorithm Complementarity

A Mixed-Methods Analysis of the Algorithm-Mediated Labor of Online Food Deliverers in China

Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers

Gig worker’s perceived algorithmic management, stress appraisal, and destructive deviant behavior

Algorithm Sensemaking: How Platform Workers Make Sense of Algorithmic Management

Challenge or Hindrance? The Dual Impact of Algorithmic Control on Gig Workers' Prosocial Service Behaviors

The emergence of algorithmic solidarity: unveiling mutual aid practices and resistance among Chinese delivery workers

Platformic Management, Boundary Resources for Gig Work, and Worker Autonomy

Algorithmic management on digital labour platforms: A systematic literature review

Algorithmic management in the gig economy: A systematic review and research integration

Artificial intelligence at work: The problem of managerial control from call centers to transport platforms

Algorithms and the future of work

Investigating engagement and burnout of gig-workers in the age of algorithms: an empirical study in digital labor platforms