The Modulation of Expectation Violation on Attention: Evidence from the Spatial Cueing Effects

Luo Chen,Ping Zhu,Jian Li,Huixin Song,Huiying Liu,Mowei Shen,Hui Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4239456
2022-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:The current study sought to investigate whether and how the expectation violation can modulate attention by employing the exogenous spatial cueing paradigm, under the theoretical framework of the Memory Encoding Cost (MEC) model. The MEC have proposed that exogenous spatial cueing effects are mainly driven by a combination of two distinct mechanisms: attentional facilitation triggered by the presence of an abrupt cue, and attentional suppression induced by memory encoding of the cue. In current experiments, participants needed to discriminate a target letter that was sometimes preceded by an onset cue. Critical manipulations were that various types of expectation violation were introduced by regulating the probability of cue presentation (Experiment 1), the probability of cue location (Experiments 2 & 4), and the probability of irrelevant sound presentation (Experiment 3). The results showed that expectation violation could enhance the cueing effect (valid vs. invalid cue) in some cases. More crucially, all experiments consistently observed asymmetrical modulations of expectation violation on the cost (invalid vs. neutral cue) and benefit (valid vs. neutral cue) effects: expectation violation increased the cost effects while did not modulate or decreased (or even reversed) the benefit effects. The current findings are better explained by the MEC than some traditional attention models like the spotlight model: expectation violation can simultaneously enhance the attentional facilitation of the cue and memory encoding of irrelevant cue information. There findings suggest that expectation violation has a general adaptive function that modulates the selectivity of attention.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?