Abstract:Political speech enjoys the highest degree of protection by national constitutions as well as supranational and international charters (e.g. ECHR). Unlike commercial speech which, in some cases, does not enjoy constitutional protection, political speech is the foundation of constitutional democracies. The blurring line between political and commercial speech introduces a new layer of complexity in tackling hidden political advertising. Indeed, political speech is likely to attract commercial speech inside a broader scope of protection with the result that potential limitations of this kind of speech (e.g. regulation) would be required to pass a very strict test through the balance with other constitutional safeguards or legitimate interests according to the criteria of necessity, legitimacy and proportionality. This could also question the scope of other regulation designed to govern commercial speech like advertising. This paper addresses the specific challenges arising from the monetization of political speech on social media, and propose a normative argument to extend consumer disclosures to political speech. To this end, the paper compares regulatory and judicial interpretations adopted in Europe and the United States, and is structured as follows. In the first part, we explore the content monetization business models (including influencer marketing) used on social media, and we identify three types of influencer ‘personas’ who are prone to engage in political speech. The second part looks into the constitutional differences between commercial and political speech across the Atlantic. The third part provides the normative argument at the intersection between consumer law and freedom of expression, and the fourth part concludes.

Campaign Contributions as Crime: The Case of Contribution Influence on US Economic and Environmental Policy

Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

Social Media, Money, and Politics: Campaign Finance in the 2016 US Congressional Cycle

A Theory of Small Campaign Contributions

Complex Contagion of Campaign Donations

Political Campaign finance and the United States Foreign Policy Decisions: A Cursory Look at the Jewish Lobby Group and the United States Middle East foreign policy

Campaign Finance in the Age of Super PACs

Negation of Sanctions: the Personal Effect of Political Contributions

Can money buy control of Congress?

How Dark Is It? An Investigation of Dark Money Operations in U.S. Nonprofit Political Advocacy Organizations

Corporate Political Connections and Favorable Environmental Regulatory Enforcement

Individual campaign contributions and candidate ideology

Campaign Contributions and Access to Congressional Offices: Patterns in Foreign Lobbying Data

Social Media and Political Contributions: The Impact of New Technology on Political Competition

Competition, scandal, or ideology? A congruence analysis of Australian political finance reforms (1980–2020)

Donor activity is associated with US legislators' attention to political issues

Is corporate social responsibility value relevant? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of anti-corruption campaign

Does money have a conservative bias? Estimating the causal impact of Citizens United on state legislative preferences

Moment or movement – the heterogeneous impact of the Black Lives Matter movement on personal and societal charitable crowdfunding campaigns

The Influencer Republic: Monetizing Political Speech on Social Media

Political Connection, Corporate Philanthropy and Efficiency: Evidence from China's Anti-Corruption Campaign