Campaign Finance in the Age of Super PACs

Christian Cox
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3794817
2021-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:The United States Supreme Court 2010 decision in 'Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission' led to a major deregulation of election campaign finance law. A new political action committee emerged, known as the Super PAC, with a relatively unfettered ability to raise and spend money in elections. I characterize the influence of Super PACs on U.S. Congressional elections by estimating an election contest model. The model provides a tractable framework to analyze the effects of multiple heterogeneous players on election outcomes, incorporating endogenous candidate entry, candidate policy, committee entry, and committee spending across both the primary and general elections. I allow for unobserved heterogeneity in candidate quality and committee costs. Results indicate that Super PACs have small effects on voting outcomes and did, on average, slightly help Republicans. They affect behavior of other committees, with differences across political party and incumbency status. Finally, Super PACs have modest effects on candidate platforms and entry.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?