Abstract:This article provides an applied analysis of the social network technologies used by Western IT-companies to exert a direct or indirect influence on political processes. The study focuses on a set of tools that were employed to shape the media landscape during the 2020 presidential election campaign in the United States. Overall, the empirical observations suggest that the largest networking services (such as Facebook, Twitter, Google, YouTube, etc.) more or less contributed to the success of the Democratic candidate. Having studied the relevant U.S. experience, the authors identify a set of manipulative techniques used by social network administrators to form specific electoral attitudes among users. These include blocking accounts; setting up search algorithms to produce pre-programmed results; labeling ideologically objectionable materials as “fake”, “untrustworthy”, “manipulative” and “potentially dangerous”; automatically recommending certain materials for viewing; and removing or pessimizing unwanted content. Seeking to expand their own audience, social networks flood the media space with so-called “partisan” content, which is vigorously welcomed by one part of society and just as vigorously rejected by another. This leads to polarization and radicalization of the masses. The most destructive consequences of this process can be witnessed in the United States, where Democrat and Republican supporters become not just political opponents but real antagonists. Social media, search engines and news aggregators, developing their capacity as political actors, pave the way to a qualitative change in the established electoral practices. The greatest concern is the ability of IT-companies to manipulate the political consciousness and behavior of citizens during crucial election campaigns. Considering this circumstance, the authors raise a question about the need to regulate the political and communication processes unfolding on the Internet platforms.

Competition, Politics, & Social Media

Social Media and Political Contributions: The Impact of New Technology on Political Competition

Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter

Political Discourse on Social Media: Echo Chambers, Gatekeepers, and the Price of Bipartisanship

Social Media, Money, and Politics: Campaign Finance in the 2016 US Congressional Cycle

Modern technologies of social management in the US political process (using the example of the 2020 presidential election campaign)

Public discourse and social network echo chambers driven by socio-cognitive biases

Political Elites in the Attention Economy: Visibility Over Civility and Credibility?

How politicians adapt to new media logic. A longitudinal perspective on accommodation to user-engagement on facebook

Microtargeting, voters’ unawareness, and democracy

Analysis of The Influence of Communication and Promotion in Digital Social Media on Citizens' Participation in The Election

Taking stock of social-political polarization in Asia: political communication, social media and digital governance

OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES TOWARDS THE 2024 ELECTION: THE "ECHO CHAMBER" PHENOMENON AND THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON THE LEVELS OF POLITICAL LITERACY OF BEGINNER AND MILLENNIAL VOTER

Incidental News Exposure on Social Media: A Campaign Communication Mediation Approach

Misinformation Regulation in the Presence of Competition between Social Media Platforms (Extended Version)

Evolution of Digital Advertising Strategies during the 2020 US Presidential Primary

Echo chamber amplification and disagreement effects in the political activity of Twitter users

Electoral Campaigns as Dynamic Contests

Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects over Time

Changing Public Opinion and Politics in the Social Media Era

Competing Activists--Political Polarization